Page: |
Home > Technical Chat > N/A MG Metro cam profile | |||||||
![]() 562 Posts Member #: 9285 Post Whore Oxfordshire |
27th Jan, 2012 at 07:13:32pm
Just wondering if there is a manufacturer that make a cam with the same profile as the on mentioned in the title?
My build thread: http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.php?p=vt&tid=454802
|
||||||
![]() 4633 Posts Member #: 20 My sister is so fit I won't show anyone her picture Lake District |
27th Jan, 2012 at 07:24:40pm
Kent do, under the title KC500 I believe. |
||||||
![]() 3673 Posts Member #: 9300 Post Whore Quarry Bonk |
27th Jan, 2012 at 07:25:16pm
There is a Kent cam thats either the same or very close, think it may be a 500? On 26th Jan, 2012 Tom Fenton said:
ring problems are down to wear or abuse but although annoying it isn't a show stopper On 5th Aug, 2014 madmk1 said:
Shit the bed! I had snapped the end of my shaft off!! 17.213 @ 71mph, 64bhp n/a (Old Engine) |
||||||
![]() 562 Posts Member #: 9285 Post Whore Oxfordshire |
27th Jan, 2012 at 10:03:54pm
Thanks chaps. My build thread: http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.php?p=vt&tid=454802
|
||||||
2496 Posts Member #: 1954 Post Whore Luton Bedfordshire |
28th Jan, 2012 at 12:14:45am
The sw 05, kent 266 and the MG na can shaft profiles are virtually identical when you compare there lobe profiles. Own the day
|
||||||
![]() 11046 Posts Member #: 965 Post Whore Preston On The Brook |
28th Jan, 2012 at 10:32:50am
On 28th Jan, 2012 Mr Joshua said:
The sw 05, kent 266 and the MG na can shaft profiles are virtually identical when you compare there lobe profiles. No they are not, but then it depends on what you mean by 'virtually' On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be... So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'... On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........ |
||||||
![]() 11046 Posts Member #: 965 Post Whore Preston On The Brook |
28th Jan, 2012 at 10:52:54am
MG
Edited by Sprocket on 28th Jan, 2012. On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be... So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'... On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........ |
||||||
![]() 11046 Posts Member #: 965 Post Whore Preston On The Brook |
28th Jan, 2012 at 11:03:44am
and while i'm looking at the data
On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be... So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'... On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........ |
||||||
1226 Posts Member #: 9271 Post Whore Stoke on Trent |
28th Jan, 2012 at 11:04:07am
So as a basic spec/theory, what figures are you looking for in the cam specs on paper to highlight it for possible turbo use? one day boost will be mine!
On 10th Mar, 2012 Joe C said:
TBH peple stick it everywhere... and theres merits to each... |
||||||
3006 Posts Member #: 2500 Post Whore Buckinghamshire |
28th Jan, 2012 at 11:05:27am
Many thanks for that Colin, very illuminating. I have a MG NA cam in the car ATM and am building another engine with a Kent 266 - it will be interesting to see if I can detect any difference. |
||||||
![]() 6752 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
28th Jan, 2012 at 11:13:55am
On 28th Jan, 2012 Sprocket said:
MG Inlet 252 degrees, LCA 110 degrees, lift 6.68mm Exhaust 268 degrees, LCA 105 degrees, lift 6.68mm LSA 107.5 degrees Overlap 45 degrees KC500 Inlet 252 degrees, LCA 110 degrees, lift 6.7mm Exhaust 268 degrees, LCA 105 degrees, lift 6.7mm LSA 107.5 degres Overlap 45 degrees SW5 Inlet 244 degrees, LCA 106 degrees, lift 7.14mm Exhaust 244 degrees, LCA 110 degrees, lift 7.14mm LSA 108 degrees Overlap 28 degrees MD266 Inlet 260 degrees, LCA 106 degrees, lift 6.68mm Exhaust 270 degrees, LCA 106 degrees, lift 6.81mm LSA 106 degrees Overlap 53 degrees colin , have you checked to see if all those numbers quoted are measured at the same lift ,and whether its at the lobe or the valve ,and if at the valve which ratio rocker its with ,to make sure they are all truly comparable . Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
![]() 11046 Posts Member #: 965 Post Whore Preston On The Brook |
28th Jan, 2012 at 12:55:46pm
lobe lift
On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be... So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'... On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........ |
||||||
![]() 8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
28th Jan, 2012 at 01:47:27pm
The problem is that none of the cams that I've measured actually relate to the quoted values.
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
![]() 6752 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
28th Jan, 2012 at 02:30:12pm
On 28th Jan, 2012 Sprocket said:
lobe lift The KC500, and the MD266 checked with data on the respective web site, and cross refferenced with AC Dodd's information on the ML Motorsorts and double checked on RB racing cam calculator. Swiftunes website looks as though its down at the moment. at what lobe lift are the durations checked ,eg, is everyone using the same lift point to start and stop measuring ? i have found this can vary between manufacturers ,and make a big diff . eg 0.001..0.004,..0.005 even 0.1mm , i have seen a variety of test points. Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
![]() 12307 Posts Member #: 565 Carlos Fandango Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex |
28th Jan, 2012 at 02:38:51pm
yep, 50thou lift can be 50 from the base circle... or from the tappet seting height.. or at the valve... etc On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged... Joe, do you have a photo of your tool? http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1 https://joe1977.imgbb.com/ |
||||||
![]() 8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
28th Jan, 2012 at 03:48:13pm
This 50 thou measuring thing came about in the US during the 80s when most cars had hydraulic tappets. It seems to have been adapted throughout the world as the defacto standard, but it was originally concieved as the "give" in the hydraulic tappets before they lifted the valve.
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
![]() 12307 Posts Member #: 565 Carlos Fandango Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex |
28th Jan, 2012 at 03:50:37pm
a useful measurement though, as long as your taking the measurements from the same datum. On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged... Joe, do you have a photo of your tool? http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1 https://joe1977.imgbb.com/ |
||||||
![]() 8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
28th Jan, 2012 at 04:07:19pm
True.
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
![]() 11046 Posts Member #: 965 Post Whore Preston On The Brook |
28th Jan, 2012 at 04:45:07pm
Checking height 0.015" Edit** I think Kent's checking height is around 0.0125" judging by Keith Dodd's figures EDIT again**** Nope, kent state 0.016" checking height at the valve, so 0.0125" is at the lobe. Either way, AC Dodds info does seam to at least compare data accurately.
Edited by Sprocket on 28th Jan, 2012. On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be... So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'... On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........ |
||||||
![]() 8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
28th Jan, 2012 at 05:24:56pm
Ha ha...... you have to use a calculator to work out duration and LCA.
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
![]() 11046 Posts Member #: 965 Post Whore Preston On The Brook |
28th Jan, 2012 at 05:32:43pm
I don't have the stamina, I was brought up in an age of the calculator On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be... So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'... On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........ |
||||||
![]() 4890 Posts Member #: 1775 Post Whore Chester |
28th Jan, 2012 at 07:04:20pm
I'm thinking of using the 274 next time the engine is out, just because I have been recommended a cam with 112 lca. I run a supercharger and I don't care the TB is on the wrong side.
|
||||||
![]() 16540 Posts Member #: 4241 King Gaycharger, butt plug dealer, Sheldon Cooper and a BAC but generally a niceish fella if you dont mind a northerner Rotherham, South Yorkshire |
28th Jan, 2012 at 07:08:41pm
I've got a 274 for mine Graham. On 11th Feb, 2015 robert said:
i tried putting soap on it , and heating it to brown , then slathered my new lube on it ![]() |
||||||
![]() 10022 Posts Member #: 1456 Mongo Barnsley, South Flatcapshire |
28th Jan, 2012 at 07:27:45pm
274 injection sounds tempting to me too. If something is worth doing, it's worth doing half of. |
||||||
2496 Posts Member #: 1954 Post Whore Luton Bedfordshire |
28th Jan, 2012 at 08:55:57pm
Sorry that my earlier post was a massive generalization but I used the same path for checking my figures. The reason I made the generalization was that on inputting the figures I had for a base cam profile it spat out figures that were somewhere between the sw 05 and kent 266.
Edited by Mr Joshua on 28th Jan, 2012. Own the day
|
||||||
Home > Technical Chat > N/A MG Metro cam profile | |||||||
|
Page: |