Donations towards server fund so far this month.

 
£0.00 / £100.00 per month
Page:
Home > Technical Chat > Oil modifications

Turbo This..

User Avatar

1767 Posts
Member #: 9165
Previously josh4444

Australia, brisbane

first up i given the search function a good go.
please read and offer your thoughts i am thinking out loud trying to pick the good from bad in terms of mods

as you may know im building a turbo charged 1098cc motor intended for use on the street/track it will be a weekend car that i want to last a long time so im having a good go at getting things right after all its my second build but first solo

on my searching i found this thread http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.php?p=vt&tid=294002


My questions regarding this topic are in terms of getting more oil flow around the engine
so thats mains, big ends, thrusts, drop gears, timing chain, rockers, lifters and pistons..

lest start with my main concern the mains as seen in the link it seems well know that the big ends draw oil from the mains via centrifugal force so in my mind we need to ether restrict the big end flow or increase flow on the main two options said many times in the search function so how do we do such a thing?

i think i dont like the idea of restricting oil as that may lead to problems!
looking at the crank i see what looks like a restrictor in one of the holes on the big end this hole goes right throw to the main the other hole is only intersecting the other




i think you want to introduce oil to the big end at bdc just as it builds compression and also as it passes down on the first half of the power stroke or in other words just before/in front of the bearing is at max load
as for the mains im thinking i will use the grove all round ones to give a constant equal film also so long as there is oil the big ends will be feeding the big ends vs a plain bottom bearing that is mostly not feeding oil for half the cycle







to me it looks like its feeding oil behind the peak load? is this because it takes time to flow

Edited by Turbo This.. on 16th Aug, 2013.


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook

After my center main bearing failure, I went mad reading up on plain journal bearing lubrication in an effort to better understand why it happened in the first instance (forgetting that Oring for a minute *tongue*).

I cam to a conclusion quite quickly that the average cross drilled crank might actually reduce the load carrying of the big ends. This was because as you have pointed out, the oil feed hole is now in a highly loaded region during the power stroke. once I understood this, I have not used a cross drilled crank. Is there any real need to? What you do have to consider is that the center main bearing supplies two big end journals while the other main bearings only supply the one. This means that the center main bearing has to flow twice what the others do. The cross sectional area of the center main oil feed is much the same as that of the others two. This is the main restriction to oil flow.

I have spoken with a couple of wise and wonderful people on this subject and they both said the same thing without being asked. Open up the center main oil feed.

Don't go mad with it, as you only need to increase the diameter of the feed a little to increase the cross sectional area a lot.

Plain bearings against grooved bearings. That has been discussed before. The conclusion I cam to is that the plain bottom bearing does exactly what it is supposed to, increase the load carrying ability, by nearly 75%. The fact that there appears to be an interrupted oil flow to the big ends is in fact nothing to be concerned with. The big end still receives enough oil flow to satisfy its demand (there is no point pushing more oil that is required up there)

one thing that is important is the bearing clearance. Figures quoted in a certain infamous yellow book are just wrong, and when I questioned the man in person, he got very irate lol. Bearing clearances need to be no bigger than 0.002" and better towards the 0.001" or less. This sorts of clearances on the lower end need to have bearing housings checked for size and alignment, and the crank needs to be straight, with accurate journal sizing (just doesn't happen on certain manufactures product) The finish of the journals is very important too.

When I get a chance, I upload the documents I found that explains how plain journal bearing lubrication works.

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


BENROSS

User Avatar

9812 Posts
Member #: 332
Resident Cylinder Head Modifier

Mitsi Evo 7, 911, Cossie. & all the chavs ...... won no problem

Colin, your problem, with the centre main issue was, the oil jets and high RPM above 7000 even for a split second, outstripped the flow of oil to the centre main for a second causing the damage.
With plain faced bearing,

If your crank had been through drilled on the mains the plain bearing would have received oil every 180degrees instead of ever 360 ........ my point in your case Colin is...... plain bearings and revs above 7000 without the crank been through drilled is asking for trouble! Especially with undercrown cooling jets fitted out stripping the flow........ hope this gives you some thoughts colin






Chalkie

1909 Posts
Member #: 9764
Post Whore

Northamptonshire.

The end bearing near the clutch end needs dremling out ill grab some pictures


Carlzilla

User Avatar

3673 Posts
Member #: 9300
Post Whore

Quarry Bonk

Before anything I've decided to get a high capacity 'turbo' oil pump, that way I know I have plenty of scope for anything like this when the time comes.

On 26th Jan, 2012 Tom Fenton said:
ring problems are down to wear or abuse but although annoying it isn't a show stopper

On 5th Aug, 2014 madmk1 said:
Shit the bed! I had snapped the end of my shaft off!!

17.213 @ 71mph, 64bhp n/a (Old Engine)


Chalkie

1909 Posts
Member #: 9764
Post Whore

Northamptonshire.

grinded it out so it matches the bearing hole

they are way out on small bore engines, half the hole was coverd before I did this needs a little bit more but other than that should help

Also going to do Oil pump end aswell

Mini mag issue 184 april 2011 covered it with a how to guide on it

I'm in process of doing water pump end opening the water way up also tapped off first 2 holes on the block too so cylinder 4 gets cooler


Attachments:

Edited by Chalkie on 16th Aug, 2013.


gr4h4m

User Avatar

4890 Posts
Member #: 1775
Post Whore

Chester

My mains cap and bearing holes were miles out. I eased the holes out so that the lined up with the bearings. At one end it was nearly 3/4 covered..

I run a supercharger and I don't care the TB is on the wrong side.
VEMS + 12 PSI + Liquid Intercooler = Small Bore FUN!


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook




On 16th Aug, 2013 BENROSS said:
Colin, your problem, with the centre main issue was, the oil jets and high RPM above 7000 even for a split second, outstripped the flow of oil to the centre main for a second causing the damage.
With plain faced bearing,

If your crank had been through drilled on the mains the plain bearing would have received oil every 180degrees instead of ever 360 ........ my point in your case Colin is...... plain bearings and revs above 7000 without the crank been through drilled is asking for trouble! Especially with undercrown cooling jets fitted out stripping the flow........ hope this gives you some thoughts colin


Steve

I'll be honest and say that you are full of shit.

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


Chalkie

1909 Posts
Member #: 9764
Post Whore

Northamptonshire.




On 16th Aug, 2013 Sprocket said:



On 16th Aug, 2013 BENROSS said:
Colin, your problem, with the centre main issue was, the oil jets and high RPM above 7000 even for a split second, outstripped the flow of oil to the centre main for a second causing the damage.
With plain faced bearing,

If your crank had been through drilled on the mains the plain bearing would have received oil every 180degrees instead of ever 360 ........ my point in your case Colin is...... plain bearings and revs above 7000 without the crank been through drilled is asking for trouble! Especially with undercrown cooling jets fitted out stripping the flow........ hope this gives you some thoughts colin


Steve

I'll be honest and say that you are full of shit.




How come?


BENROSS

User Avatar

9812 Posts
Member #: 332
Resident Cylinder Head Modifier

Mitsi Evo 7, 911, Cossie. & all the chavs ...... won no problem




On 16th Aug, 2013 Sprocket said:


Steve

I'll be honest and say that you are full of shit.



Colin I wasn't having a go whatsoever!! its my take on it,..... I was leaving the question for you to give it some thought, and hoped you may give it your take on things and a civil reply, ...... "sadly you didn't".

I have always been civil to you and all the members on here, I expected the same......... But if you've had a bad day at work or WHATEVER ? ........ please don't vent it out on me, .....

this is what makes the majority of forums shite............. don't let this turbominis turn into one.

my faith in human nature and sanity has taken a huge dive once again*frown*






ministef1

User Avatar

730 Posts
Member #: 1791
Post Whore

Cranleigh, surrey

lets put our handbags away and see what others have to say.

Do many people drill to the other side?

"Cars are a lifetime of pain"


Chalkie

1909 Posts
Member #: 9764
Post Whore

Northamptonshire.

What way dose the oil flow down the crank?


paul wiginton
Forum Mod

User Avatar

5933 Posts
Member #: 784
9 times Avon Park Class C winner

Milton Keynes

When Nick Swift first built my engine he told me cross drilling is a waste of time, that crank did thousands of miles over 7000 rpm and up to 9000 very often

I seriously doubt it!


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook

On 16th Aug, 2013 BENROSS said:
Colin, your problem, with the centre main issue was, the oil jets and high RPM above 7000 even for a split second, outstripped the flow of oil to the centre main for a second causing the damage.
With plain faced bearing,

If your crank had been through drilled on the mains the plain bearing would have received oil every 180degrees instead of ever 360 ........ my point in your case Colin is...... plain bearings and revs above 7000 without the crank been through drilled is asking for trouble! Especially with undercrown cooling jets fitted out stripping the flow........ hope this gives you some thoughts colin



On 16th Aug, 2013 BENROSS said:



Colin I wasn't having a go whatsoever!! its my take on it,..... I was leaving the question for you to give it some thought, and hoped you may give it your take on things and a civil reply, ...... "sadly you didn't".

I have always been civil to you and all the members on here, I expected the same......... But if you've had a bad day at work or WHATEVER ? ........ please don't vent it out on me, .....

this is what makes the majority of forums shite............. don't let this turbominis turn into one.

my faith in human nature and sanity has taken a huge dive once again*frown*



Ok, so I need to expand on my actions above.

Firstly I see no questions in your first reply, only statements.

Secondly your theory's on why I suffered a center main bearing failure are flawed.

Thirdly, you have not provided this topic with any usefull information or theory.

The fact remains that the cross drilled crank pictured above has been done wrong putting the oil feed hole on the big ends right in the high pressure region of the journal. Oil needs to be fed into the bearing on the unloaded side of the journal. The 'shaft' does not sit in the center of the bearing under load and it also tends to 'ride' up one side of the bearing in the direction of rotation. Oil is drawn into the loaded area of the bearing by hydrodynamic action maintaining the oil film that supports the journal.

While we are here, my center main bearing failure was just that, a center main bearing failure. The big ends were all fine. I used plain bottom bearing shells in the mains, so the theory that the plain bottom bearing starves the big ends in my situation caused no adverse effects even at 8krpm. Under crown cooling jets..... If they could flow more oil than the pump could deliver, then i'll eat my shorts. The BMW cooling jets have roughly a 1mm diameter nozzle which is equivelant to a 2mm diamter hole in the oil system. The other fact is that if the oil jets outstriped the flow to the center bearing, why did the oil pressure not drop, and why did the other two main bearings not suffer the same fate? (now that is a question, not a statement)

The MED crank I used had a 0.003" baggy fit on every journal had a lot to do with the failure, the baggy fit was said to be ok in the infamous yellow book, but then the auther spat his dummy out when I questioned it, only to contradict what he said in the book lol. The crank also had 0.0015" run out and cross drilled incorrectly, like the one above.

I knew nothing of how this would affect over all reliability as do alot of well known tuning companies (well at least with their every day punter stock). It wasn't untill I did some studying and reading up on the subject, not only for this, but also for a catastrophic failure of a high speed rotating machine at work, that I realised how wrong the cross drilling and baggy clearancies were.

Plenty on the internet regarding hydrodynamic lubrication of plain journl bearings, a good one I found I have attached below.

And yes, I tend to be having lots of bad days in the last few months.


Attachments:

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


BENROSS

User Avatar

9812 Posts
Member #: 332
Resident Cylinder Head Modifier

Mitsi Evo 7, 911, Cossie. & all the chavs ...... won no problem

And yes, I tend to be having lots of bad days in the last few months. "you need to relax colin"

points taken.

anyway, with plain bearings the bearing only sees oil ever 360 degrees so ... if the mains oil gallery was drilled straight through it would see a lick of oil every 180 degrees helping the situation, because there is more loading on the "centre main" its possible that's why the bearing Wears more and or..... fails,

have a look at this write up I found Many years ago

"Turbo" main bearings were designed by Leyland’s engineers to meet a perceived need. It was decided probably by both theoretical calculation and practical test that the turbo Metro engine with its increased bearing loads needed a better bearing, so what they did was remove the oil groove from the bottom bearing shell giving roughly 30% more bearing area. It is claimed that this gives about 80% more load carrying capacity, exactly how 30% more area gives an 80% increase in capacity I’m not sure but this figure is widely claimed in both Minis and other engines and is not disputed.

O.K if it is possible to remove this groove one must wonder why it was there in the first place? To explain that you need to know a little of how the engines lubrication system works; Oil is pumped through galleries in the block to the main bearings, it passes through a hole in the bearing into the aforementioned groove, from here it flows sideways across the bearing, some of it leaking out the sides, the rest is forced into holes in the crank, travels through the crank and exits through a hole in the big end journal where it lubricates the big end / conrod bearing before leaking out the sides.

Now the next step is to think about what happens if we remove one of these grooves, remembering that turbo bearings still have a grooved top bearing. As the hole in the crank passes the grooved top bearing oil flows through the crank to the big end, no worries here but as the hole passes across the non- grooved shell there is only a gap of 0.002" for the oil to flow through therefore very little if any oil is fed to the big ends during half of every revolution, whether there is sufficient residual oil is debatable I think there isn’t. O.K. so why don’t all the turbo Metro engines suffer bearing failure?

The reason is the main bearing journals are "through drilled" that is to say that they have two oil holes 180 degrees apart so while one hole is in the non-grooved bearing the other hole lines up with the grooved bearing. Why am I telling you all this ? Not all Mini cranks have "Through Drilled" main journals! Fortunately most of them are but I have seen nitrided cross drilled "S" cranks that are not. So if you are building an engine or having one built and the subject of "turbo" bearings comes up have a good look at your crank before proceeding.

This matter is not something that I thought about until an engine I built had a big end failure, and after talking to a number of other engine builders they had not thought about it either. The cause of my big end failure has not been determined but I am almost certain that "turbo" bearings played no part in it. There aren’t a huge number of engines around using these bearings probably due to the price and the hassle to modify the block to fit them,but I haven’t heard of any failures. In fact I have used successfully myself, but only with through drilled cranks. I am not suggesting that there is anything wrong with "turbo" bearings at all, just saying look before you leap. You have been warned.







Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook

I see no one is listening to me again lol, no surprise then *happy*

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


Turbo This..

User Avatar

1767 Posts
Member #: 9165
Previously josh4444

Australia, brisbane

the input is grate guys please dont get nasty tho..

that is a good read sprocket make me think a lot more..

as Chalkie said the holes on small bores do not line up! just needs some attention with a grinder an easy fix really but some thing to keep in mind

in terms of bearing material what are/have people used and had good or bad experience with?

at this point i agree with drilling the center main feed hole a touch larger and fitting plain/grove bearings with out cross drilling as i will red line at 6500-6750 thats what the cam is and its a long stroke @ 83.72 mm

can we shed some light on the two holes on the big end? one looks like it has a restrictor in it? its a 998 crank in the picks..


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook

OK so here is a question.

Has anyone suffered a big end failure on cylinder 2 or 3?

Edit..... Has anyone suffered a big end failure?

Edited by Sprocket on 16th Aug, 2013.

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


paul wiginton
Forum Mod

User Avatar

5933 Posts
Member #: 784
9 times Avon Park Class C winner

Milton Keynes

Only once but was my own silly fault

I seriously doubt it!


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook




On 16th Aug, 2013 BENROSS said:
And yes, I tend to be having lots of bad days in the last few months. "you need to relax colin"

points taken.

anyway, with plain bearings the bearing only sees oil ever 360 degrees so ... if the mains oil gallery was drilled straight through it would see a lick of oil every 180 degrees helping the situation, because there is more loading on the "centre main" its possible that's why the bearing Wears more and or..... fails,

have a look at this write up I found Many years ago

"Turbo" main bearings were designed by Leyland’s engineers to meet a perceived need. It was decided probably by both theoretical calculation and practical test that the turbo Metro engine with its increased bearing loads needed a better bearing, so what they did was remove the oil groove from the bottom bearing shell giving roughly 30% more bearing area. It is claimed that this gives about 80% more load carrying capacity, exactly how 30% more area gives an 80% increase in capacity I’m not sure but this figure is widely claimed in both Minis and other engines and is not disputed.

O.K if it is possible to remove this groove one must wonder why it was there in the first place? To explain that you need to know a little of how the engines lubrication system works; Oil is pumped through galleries in the block to the main bearings, it passes through a hole in the bearing into the aforementioned groove, from here it flows sideways across the bearing, some of it leaking out the sides, the rest is forced into holes in the crank, travels through the crank and exits through a hole in the big end journal where it lubricates the big end / conrod bearing before leaking out the sides.

Now the next step is to think about what happens if we remove one of these grooves, remembering that turbo bearings still have a grooved top bearing. As the hole in the crank passes the grooved top bearing oil flows through the crank to the big end, no worries here but as the hole passes across the non- grooved shell there is only a gap of 0.002" for the oil to flow through therefore very little if any oil is fed to the big ends during half of every revolution, whether there is sufficient residual oil is debatable I think there isn’t. O.K. so why don’t all the turbo Metro engines suffer bearing failure?

The reason is the main bearing journals are "through drilled" that is to say that they have two oil holes 180 degrees apart so while one hole is in the non-grooved bearing the other hole lines up with the grooved bearing. Why am I telling you all this ? Not all Mini cranks have "Through Drilled" main journals! Fortunately most of them are but I have seen nitrided cross drilled "S" cranks that are not. So if you are building an engine or having one built and the subject of "turbo" bearings comes up have a good look at your crank before proceeding.

This matter is not something that I thought about until an engine I built had a big end failure, and after talking to a number of other engine builders they had not thought about it either. The cause of my big end failure has not been determined but I am almost certain that "turbo" bearings played no part in it. There aren’t a huge number of engines around using these bearings probably due to the price and the hassle to modify the block to fit them,but I haven’t heard of any failures. In fact I have used successfully myself, but only with through drilled cranks. I am not suggesting that there is anything wrong with "turbo" bearings at all, just saying look before you leap. You have been warned.




Same article on Mini Mania word for word, dated 2000. Funny how they say there aren't many 'turbo' bearings around in 2000 when all A+ engines from ~87 have them, and I have yet to see a factory 'through' drilled main journal.

The problem just doesn't exist, but if you are happy to drill your crankshafts full of holes in the high pressure regions of the journals then I'm happy that you are happy. Thats all I will say.

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


Brett

User Avatar

9502 Posts
Member #: 1023
Post Whore

Doncaster, South Yorkshire




On 16th Aug, 2013 Sprocket said:
OK so here is a question.

Has anyone suffered a big end failure on cylinder 2 or 3?

Edit..... Has anyone suffered a big end failure?

Yes but my centre main bearing was absolutely fucked
The oil pressure dropped off loooong before it started knocking on the big ends so i would guess the main bearing went first
It had just had new oil too what a waste lol

Yes i moved to the darkside *happy*

Instagram @jdm_brett


Turbo This..

User Avatar

1767 Posts
Member #: 9165
Previously josh4444

Australia, brisbane

has anyone done a mod to get extra oil to the timing chain?


paul wiginton
Forum Mod

User Avatar

5933 Posts
Member #: 784
9 times Avon Park Class C winner

Milton Keynes

Theres tons of oil in the timing chain - it unnecessary

I seriously doubt it!


Turbo This..

User Avatar

1767 Posts
Member #: 9165
Previously josh4444

Australia, brisbane

only the oil getting pressed out from the end cam and crank bearings ive not seen how much or litle actulay flows there but surely a bit more cant hert things?
im looking to reduce wear and quieten it down


paul wiginton
Forum Mod

User Avatar

5933 Posts
Member #: 784
9 times Avon Park Class C winner

Milton Keynes

More oil will just cause drag, if fitted correctly there will be no wear and will be quiet

I seriously doubt it!

Home > Technical Chat > Oil modifications
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: