| Page: |
| Home > Technical Chat > inline engine twin turbo knowledge needed | |||||||
![]() 3692 Posts Member #: 1833 Formally mini_majic Auckland, New Zealand |
6th Aug, 2007 at 10:10:36pm
ok so ive been looking into how they set-up twin turbo's on inline engines and by looking at a picture of a lexus/toyota soarer the simply split the manifold.
Edited by James_H on 6th Aug, 2007. |
||||||
![]() 4360 Posts Member #: 1459 En-suite user Braintree, Essex |
6th Aug, 2007 at 10:27:35pm
Is it better to go the turbo/charger route? Only an idea, know jack about how to approach it. On 19th Jan, 2010 wil_h said:
I would start the furthest place from the finish. On 24th Mar, 2012 apbellamy said:
I feel all special knowing that I've given your mum my wood. Been neglecting Turbo'd 'A' series.............. |
||||||
![]() 3692 Posts Member #: 1833 Formally mini_majic Auckland, New Zealand |
6th Aug, 2007 at 10:48:34pm
yeah i was looking at this earlier also. i read that you end up going down the route of LOTS of plumbing and there is the fact of needing a 1-way valve in line so as that the turbo can pull that open under vacuum when it wants more air than the supercharger can let through and this makes it really restrictive. to get over this you can have two actuated valves to close off the supercharger and open a direct path to the turbo but then you are getting into even more plumbing and space etc etc.
|
||||||
![]() 2909 Posts Member #: 83 Post Whore Glasgow, Scotland |
6th Aug, 2007 at 10:50:00pm
is there any need though? the a-sereis is a small lump, with the selection of turbochargers avaliable there will be soemthing sufficiently small for fast spool, but still efficient at high enough pressure ratios to produce serious power, all for less cost weight and complexity of 2 clunky old turbo's :)
turbo 16v k-series 11.9@118.9 :)
|
||||||
![]() 4559 Posts Member #: 786 Post Whore Bermingum |
6th Aug, 2007 at 10:51:31pm
Hi,
VEMs Authorised Installer / Re-seller. K head kits now available!
|
||||||
![]() 3692 Posts Member #: 1833 Formally mini_majic Auckland, New Zealand |
6th Aug, 2007 at 10:59:59pm
well i have just blown my own plans out of the water as i have just seen fastcarls kad turbo and that gives the sort of figures i was looking at (more to be honest) and so its sort of abit pointless having two turbo's when i can get the power from one. have been reading alot of turbo build projects lately also and with the a-series it seems that not much boost is needed on a decent set-up to produce decent power.
|
||||||
|
Site Admin ![]() 8506 Posts Member #: 16 Sold the turbo and seeing what the C20XE can do! Near Lincoln |
7th Aug, 2007 at 10:08:49am
I'm running 180banana's at 14psi at the mo on a 5 port, still more boost to go yet on a fair sized turbo.
|
||||||
|
591 Posts Member #: 360 Stu from Corwall aka Mr Jazz Piano, Love_Machine, kneegrow |
8th Aug, 2007 at 11:35:16am
Consider this:- A supercharger being blown through by a T3. Between the turbo and blower is a valve which opens under vacuum. This allows the supercharger to suck. You also have the supercharger geared very high, so that it is efficient still at low revs. As the turbo starts blowing, the pressure diff across the blower approaches zero AND SO DOES THE POWER REQUIRED TO DRIVE THE BLOWER. So, you have all the bonuses without all the pipework. Fitting all in will be fun though. It would be doable though. Bugger off, I'm getting there. |
||||||
![]() 3692 Posts Member #: 1833 Formally mini_majic Auckland, New Zealand |
8th Aug, 2007 at 10:45:42pm
On 8th of Aug, 2007 at 11:35am Hedgemonkey said:
Consider this:- A supercharger being blown through by a T3. Between the turbo and blower is a valve which opens under vacuum. This allows the supercharger to suck. You also have the supercharger geared very high, so that it is efficient still at low revs. As the turbo starts blowing, the pressure diff across the blower approaches zero AND SO DOES THE POWER REQUIRED TO DRIVE THE BLOWER. So, you have all the bonuses without all the pipework. Fitting all in will be fun though. It would be doable though. i dont know if its because im tired (12 hours of work :( ) or because im just abit stupid but that has just confused me. i am more and more realising that ITS JUST NOT NEEDED, yes it would be nice for the statement "i have a twin turbo, 16v, a series" and watch some faces glow . but for a road going track car
A) its un-needed weight B)i can see it being hard enough to get 200bhp to the ground on a single turbo let alone twin. C)at the end of the day is it worth all the extra work? still, i would love to see it done!! maybe in the future for me ey! you kept on saying "the right size turbo" is this a secret or can i become wise in your ways? also, with everyone running so many bananas and torque do you have it on 13's because i really want it on 10's for the look and for on the track but i am worried about traction. i would be wraping them in good tires to help this but it doesnt stop me from being worried. can anybody recommend a specific final drive??? sorry i have soo many questions people! |
||||||
| Home > Technical Chat > inline engine twin turbo knowledge needed | |||||||
|
|||||||
| Page: |



but i will be doing all i can to give my self more space and also save space in the construction. such as turbo box, full length webber box and the rest of it. i think that a twin turbo would work out better for a 16v mini due to the fact of less plumbing than a t-s/c and SLIGHTLY less space to taken up. i was just wondering if 2 port per turbo issue would be a big problem and if so if anybody has got any ideas to overcome this?!



. but for a road going track car