| Page: |
| Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > Rimflow valves???? | |||||||
|
112 Posts Member #: 1613 Advanced Member N. Ireland |
14th Nov, 2007 at 06:54:07pm
Just about to start buying valves, springs etc for the cyclinder head and i was just wondering is there any benefit to using rimflow valves instead of the regular race inlet and exhaust valves minispares sells? |
||||||
![]() 4559 Posts Member #: 786 Post Whore Bermingum |
14th Nov, 2007 at 07:10:42pm
Hi,
VEMs Authorised Installer / Re-seller. K head kits now available!
|
||||||
|
112 Posts Member #: 1613 Advanced Member N. Ireland |
14th Nov, 2007 at 07:13:52pm
oh is that right! I knew that they were meant to be the best on an n/a motor but i did a search here and nobody had mentioned them........suppose that says it all really |
||||||
|
194 Posts Member #: 1297 Advanced Member Sunny Stockport |
14th Nov, 2007 at 08:49:49pm
I'm running Rimflow inlets in my head for no other reason than I've always used them in my N/A motors so carried on with them on my turbo. No idea if they work any better as I've not done any back to back tests! |
||||||
|
1641 Posts Member #: 178 Post Whore stowmaket suffolk |
15th Nov, 2007 at 06:53:54am
they do work better in a na motor so work slightly better in a turbo, i used them for a few years but just use standard ones now with no side effects, plus they are a dam sight cheeper always looking for them bigger bunches of bannanas |
||||||
![]() 9812 Posts Member #: 332 Resident Cylinder Head Modifier Mitsi Evo 7, 911, Cossie. & all the chavs ...... won no problem |
15th Nov, 2007 at 06:01:48pm
use minispares 214N Stainless race valves with the waist on them
|
||||||
![]() 8297 Posts Member #: 408 Turbo Love Palace Fool Aylesbury |
15th Nov, 2007 at 09:13:23pm
I used to use rimflow inlets and mini spares stainless race exhust valves...before I went to the dark side! https://www.facebook.com/pages/Fusion-Fabri..._homepage_panel
|
||||||
|
3596 Posts Member #: 655 Post Whore Northern Ireland |
15th Nov, 2007 at 11:50:53pm
Wasnt the big thing about the Rimflows, the anti-reversion groove on the valve ?
9.85 @ 145mph
|
||||||
|
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
16th Nov, 2007 at 08:47:31am
If you pick the right turbo, then EGBP will be lower than boost and you will not get any reversion.
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
![]() 12307 Posts Member #: 565 Carlos Fandango Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex |
16th Nov, 2007 at 09:56:57am
the aniti reversion groove was only on the intakes anyway,
On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged... Joe, do you have a photo of your tool? http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1 https://joe1977.imgbb.com/ |
||||||
|
3596 Posts Member #: 655 Post Whore Northern Ireland |
16th Nov, 2007 at 02:57:13pm
On 16th of Nov, 2007 at 08:47am Paul S said:
If you pick the right turbo, then EGBP will be lower than boost and you will not get any reversion. Show me a useable and practical setup that has EGBP lower than boost and I'll be very very impressed !!!!! At the minute, I dont know of anyone, running very fast, or very slow that is meeting that criteria, although many would love to. 9.85 @ 145mph
|
||||||
|
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
16th Nov, 2007 at 03:15:36pm
On 16th of Nov, 2007 at 02:57pm stevieturbo said:
On 16th of Nov, 2007 at 08:47am Paul S said:
If you pick the right turbo, then EGBP will be lower than boost and you will not get any reversion. Show me a useable and practical setup that has EGBP lower than boost and I'll be very very impressed !!!!! At the minute, I dont know of anyone, running very fast, or very slow that is meeting that criteria, although many would love to. I stand corrected. I was under the impression that EGBP was usually lower than boost. This seems to be one of those imponderables that we need to resolve. Anyone know where I can get a pressure transducer that can withstand high temperatures like 1000 deg C? Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
|
Site Admin ![]() 8506 Posts Member #: 16 Sold the turbo and seeing what the C20XE can do! Near Lincoln |
16th Nov, 2007 at 03:52:53pm
nope, but run it off a length of tube and you can considerable reduce the temperture. the response will not be as fast but still should be useable. |
||||||
|
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
16th Nov, 2007 at 04:10:43pm
On 16th of Nov, 2007 at 03:52pm iain said:
nope, but run it off a length of tube and you can considerable reduce the temperture. the response will not be as fast but still should be useable. I've got a boss and length of stainless that Rover fitted to the carb 1275s in the 90s - that'll do the job. I could then use a normal MAP sensor that will give me a 0-5v output to feed into my Innovate LM-1 datalog system. There should be enough enthalpy in the exhaust gas stream to drive the turbo without the turbine inlet pressure going above boost, but it will be interesting to log it and see. Then we can answer the question about Rimflo valves LOL. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
![]() 6753 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
16th Nov, 2007 at 05:53:15pm
the situation is that the inlet pressure is normally higher than the ebp , unitl a certain point in the rev band , thisa point is decided by how low you want the boost to come in ,and how efficiently everything is running , if you have the boost come in say 4k and max power is 5.5k then you could have a lower ebp ,but it would be a drag only car with a high converter . i have measured 30 psi ebp on a 20 psi inlet pr motor ,and was happy with that at max power .
Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
|
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
16th Nov, 2007 at 06:17:41pm
On 16th of Nov, 2007 at 05:53pm robert said:
the situation is that the inlet pressure is normally higher than the ebp , unitl a certain point in the rev band , thisa point is decided by how low you want the boost to come in ,and how efficiently everything is running , if you have the boost come in say 4k and max power is 5.5k then you could have a lower ebp ,but it would be a drag only car with a high converter . i have measured 30 psi ebp on a 20 psi inlet pr motor ,and was happy with that at max power . I'm surprised at that, but them I'm only a novice compared to you seasoned turbo guys. I started a post a few weeks ago about reading turbine maps, but only concluded that there is insufficient data published by Garrett to do any useful calcs. If we are getting high EGBP, then no wonder the VE is not very good. On 16th of Nov, 2007 at 05:53pm robert said:
to measure it paul , i used a brake fitting welded to the manifold ,and a 20 inch length of copper breake pipe in a coil and then a plastic hose on that to a guage ,worked perfectly , also you could do a run with the aux 3 on the inlet ,then another with it on the zorst ,and then overlay them in logworks ? That's the plan. Do you know if you export the data to Excel? Should be able to log pressures and temps all the way through, then it will highlight where the inefficiencies are. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
|
3596 Posts Member #: 655 Post Whore Northern Ireland |
16th Nov, 2007 at 08:44:02pm
30:20 is still pretty damn good if you are getting a good wide useable power band from it.
9.85 @ 145mph
|
||||||
![]() 6753 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
19th Nov, 2007 at 06:06:24pm
On 16th of Nov, 2007 at 06:17pm Paul S said:
On 16th of Nov, 2007 at 05:53pm robert said:
the situation is that the inlet pressure is normally higher than the ebp , unitl a certain point in the rev band , thisa point is decided by how low you want the boost to come in ,and how efficiently everything is running , if you have the boost come in say 4k and max power is 5.5k then you could have a lower ebp ,but it would be a drag only car with a high converter . i have measured 30 psi ebp on a 20 psi inlet pr motor ,and was happy with that at max power . I'm surprised at that, but them I'm only a novice compared to you seasoned turbo guys. I started a post a few weeks ago about reading turbine maps, but only concluded that there is insufficient data published by Garrett to do any useful calcs. If we are getting high EGBP, then no wonder the VE is not very good. On 16th of Nov, 2007 at 05:53pm robert said:
to measure it paul , i used a brake fitting welded to the manifold ,and a 20 inch length of copper breake pipe in a coil and then a plastic hose on that to a guage ,worked perfectly , also you could do a run with the aux 3 on the inlet ,then another with it on the zorst ,and then overlay them in logworks ? That's the plan. Do you know if you export the data to Excel? Should be able to log pressures and temps all the way through, then it will highlight where the inefficiencies are. Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
|
141 Posts Member #: 954 Advanced Member Fort Collins Colorado USA |
19th Nov, 2007 at 09:01:32pm
OK, this is confusing.
1275 with Back Door Turbo |
||||||
|
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
19th Nov, 2007 at 09:05:36pm
On 19th of Nov, 2007 at 09:01pm fortfun said:
At the point where the intake valve opens, you'll have more pressure left inside the cylinder than in the intake manifold, and won't draw in any charge. The only way I can see it would work like this is if the exhaust pressure is quite spikey and you manage to blow down the cylinder far below the average (measured) exhaust pressure. This is only at the start of the intake stroke. As soon as the exhaust valve closes and the piston drops, air will be pushed in. However, it must seriously reduce the volumetric efficiency of the engine. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
![]() 6753 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
20th Nov, 2007 at 01:25:13am
On 19th of Nov, 2007 at 09:01pm fortfun said:
OK, this is confusing. How can the engine run this way? At the point where the intake valve opens, you'll have more pressure left inside the cylinder than in the intake manifold, and won't draw in any charge. The only way I can see it would work like this is if the exhaust pressure is quite spikey and you manage to blow down the cylinder far below the average (measured) exhaust pressure. Not doubting the data, just looking for some info to stop my head spinning. yes this can happen , in fact if you open the inlet valve early enough ,you can get the ex moving from the port to the cylinder and up the inlet ,ughhh Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
|
3596 Posts Member #: 655 Post Whore Northern Ireland |
20th Nov, 2007 at 01:28:41am
Which is why a lot of turbo applications do not like overlap.
9.85 @ 145mph
|
||||||
![]() 9812 Posts Member #: 332 Resident Cylinder Head Modifier Mitsi Evo 7, 911, Cossie. & all the chavs ...... won no problem |
20th Nov, 2007 at 01:53:52am
EGBP is the killer as we know
|
||||||
|
141 Posts Member #: 954 Advanced Member Fort Collins Colorado USA |
20th Nov, 2007 at 03:32:55am
Right. Of course. Volumetric efficiency shot to heck for sure though as Paul noted.
1275 with Back Door Turbo |
||||||
|
1641 Posts Member #: 178 Post Whore stowmaket suffolk |
20th Nov, 2007 at 05:30:27am
i gained 5hp on my na 1380 when running rimflows always looking for them bigger bunches of bannanas |
||||||
| Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > Rimflow valves???? | |||||||
|
|||||||
| Page: |








for road use