Page:
Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > Rimflow valves????

bertieboo

112 Posts
Member #: 1613
Advanced Member

N. Ireland

Just about to start buying valves, springs etc for the cyclinder head and i was just wondering is there any benefit to using rimflow valves instead of the regular race inlet and exhaust valves minispares sells?


Bat

User Avatar

4559 Posts
Member #: 786
Post Whore

Bermingum

Hi,
They make a difference in a N/A engine if you're running a big cam, but some say not to use them on a turbo motor?
Cheers,
Gavin :)

VEMs Authorised Installer / Re-seller. K head kits now available!

WB/EGT gauges. Click here for customers write-up

Visit www.doyouneedabrain.co.uk

My Mini build diary


bertieboo

112 Posts
Member #: 1613
Advanced Member

N. Ireland

oh is that right! I knew that they were meant to be the best on an n/a motor but i did a search here and nobody had mentioned them........suppose that says it all really


neilj1678

194 Posts
Member #: 1297
Advanced Member

Sunny Stockport

I'm running Rimflow inlets in my head for no other reason than I've always used them in my N/A motors so carried on with them on my turbo. No idea if they work any better as I've not done any back to back tests!


turbo hogster

1641 Posts
Member #: 178
Post Whore

stowmaket suffolk

they do work better in a na motor so work slightly better in a turbo, i used them for a few years but just use standard ones now with no side effects, plus they are a dam sight cheeper

always looking for them bigger bunches of bannanas


BENROSS

User Avatar

9812 Posts
Member #: 332
Resident Cylinder Head Modifier

Mitsi Evo 7, 911, Cossie. & all the chavs ...... won no problem

use minispares 214N Stainless race valves with the waist on them

they are hard to beat






matty

User Avatar

8297 Posts
Member #: 408
Turbo Love Palace Fool

Aylesbury

I used to use rimflow inlets and mini spares stainless race exhust valves...before I went to the dark side!

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Fusion-Fabri..._homepage_panel

www.fusionfabs.co.uk



1/4mile in 13.2sec @ 111 terminal on 15psi


stevieturbo

3596 Posts
Member #: 655
Post Whore

Northern Ireland

Wasnt the big thing about the Rimflows, the anti-reversion groove on the valve ?

Surely this should offer benefits on a turbo engine, as reversion is highly likely due to EGBP.

9.85 @ 145mph
202mph standing mile
speed didn't kill me, but taxation probably will


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

If you pick the right turbo, then EGBP will be lower than boost and you will not get any reversion.

Hence, the Rimflow will not be beneficial.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

the aniti reversion groove was only on the intakes anyway,

this could be of benefit when the engines off boost.

the exhausts just had a nice big radius on the edge of the chamber side of the valve. chich would be easy enough to do to an ordinary valve.

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



stevieturbo

3596 Posts
Member #: 655
Post Whore

Northern Ireland




On 16th of Nov, 2007 at 08:47am Paul S said:
If you pick the right turbo, then EGBP will be lower than boost and you will not get any reversion.



Show me a useable and practical setup that has EGBP lower than boost and I'll be very very impressed !!!!!

At the minute, I dont know of anyone, running very fast, or very slow that is meeting that criteria, although many would love to.

9.85 @ 145mph
202mph standing mile
speed didn't kill me, but taxation probably will


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland



On 16th of Nov, 2007 at 02:57pm stevieturbo said:



On 16th of Nov, 2007 at 08:47am Paul S said:
If you pick the right turbo, then EGBP will be lower than boost and you will not get any reversion.



Show me a useable and practical setup that has EGBP lower than boost and I'll be very very impressed !!!!!

At the minute, I dont know of anyone, running very fast, or very slow that is meeting that criteria, although many would love to.


I stand corrected. I was under the impression that EGBP was usually lower than boost.

This seems to be one of those imponderables that we need to resolve.

Anyone know where I can get a pressure transducer that can withstand high temperatures like 1000 deg C?

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


iain
Site Admin

User Avatar

8506 Posts
Member #: 16
Sold the turbo and seeing what the C20XE can do!

Near Lincoln

nope, but run it off a length of tube and you can considerable reduce the temperture. the response will not be as fast but still should be useable.


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 16th of Nov, 2007 at 03:52pm iain said:
nope, but run it off a length of tube and you can considerable reduce the temperture. the response will not be as fast but still should be useable.


I've got a boss and length of stainless that Rover fitted to the carb 1275s in the 90s - that'll do the job. I could then use a normal MAP sensor that will give me a 0-5v output to feed into my Innovate LM-1 datalog system.

There should be enough enthalpy in the exhaust gas stream to drive the turbo without the turbine inlet pressure going above boost, but it will be interesting to log it and see.

Then we can answer the question about Rimflo valves LOL.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


robert

User Avatar

6753 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

the situation is that the inlet pressure is normally higher than the ebp , unitl a certain point in the rev band , thisa point is decided by how low you want the boost to come in ,and how efficiently everything is running , if you have the boost come in say 4k and max power is 5.5k then you could have a lower ebp ,but it would be a drag only car with a high converter . i have measured 30 psi ebp on a 20 psi inlet pr motor ,and was happy with that at max power .
to measure it paul , i used a brake fitting welded to the manifold ,and a 20 inch length of copper breake pipe in a coil and then a plastic hose on that to a guage ,worked perfectly , also you could do a run with the aux 3 on the inlet ,then another with it on the zorst ,and then overlay them in logworks ?

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland




On 16th of Nov, 2007 at 05:53pm robert said:
the situation is that the inlet pressure is normally higher than the ebp , unitl a certain point in the rev band , thisa point is decided by how low you want the boost to come in ,and how efficiently everything is running , if you have the boost come in say 4k and max power is 5.5k then you could have a lower ebp ,but it would be a drag only car with a high converter . i have measured 30 psi ebp on a 20 psi inlet pr motor ,and was happy with that at max power .


I'm surprised at that, but them I'm only a novice compared to you seasoned turbo guys.

I started a post a few weeks ago about reading turbine maps, but
only concluded that there is insufficient data published by Garrett to do any useful calcs.

If we are getting high EGBP, then no wonder the VE is not very good.
On 16th of Nov, 2007 at 05:53pm robert said:
to measure it paul , i used a brake fitting welded to the manifold ,and a 20 inch length of copper breake pipe in a coil and then a plastic hose on that to a guage ,worked perfectly , also you could do a run with the aux 3 on the inlet ,then another with it on the zorst ,and then overlay them in logworks ?


That's the plan. Do you know if you export the data to Excel?

Should be able to log pressures and temps all the way through, then it will highlight where the inefficiencies are.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


stevieturbo

3596 Posts
Member #: 655
Post Whore

Northern Ireland

30:20 is still pretty damn good if you are getting a good wide useable power band from it.

Often it can be 2:1, or 3:1, or higher !!!! EGBP vs Boost.

As others say, its easy to measure.
Ive done it before. I welded a brake pipe fitting onto the manifold, and used a long spiraled bit of brake pipe to dissipate heat. Then just stuck a regular boost gauge onto the pipe.
Although you could drill/tap something into it too, and use a similar long pipe to dissipate heat.

9.85 @ 145mph
202mph standing mile
speed didn't kill me, but taxation probably will


robert

User Avatar

6753 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus


gosh i missed this q paul ,sorry , um no i dont go to excel , i load the graph for each sets of data then overlay from the menus at the top ,cant member which one ,then adjust base time to match.... you could also do the x y graph using rpm on the x line .

On 16th of Nov, 2007 at 06:17pm Paul S said:



On 16th of Nov, 2007 at 05:53pm robert said:
the situation is that the inlet pressure is normally higher than the ebp , unitl a certain point in the rev band , thisa point is decided by how low you want the boost to come in ,and how efficiently everything is running , if you have the boost come in say 4k and max power is 5.5k then you could have a lower ebp ,but it would be a drag only car with a high converter . i have measured 30 psi ebp on a 20 psi inlet pr motor ,and was happy with that at max power .


I'm surprised at that, but them I'm only a novice compared to you seasoned turbo guys.

I started a post a few weeks ago about reading turbine maps, but
only concluded that there is insufficient data published by Garrett to do any useful calcs.

If we are getting high EGBP, then no wonder the VE is not very good.
On 16th of Nov, 2007 at 05:53pm robert said:
to measure it paul , i used a brake fitting welded to the manifold ,and a 20 inch length of copper breake pipe in a coil and then a plastic hose on that to a guage ,worked perfectly , also you could do a run with the aux 3 on the inlet ,then another with it on the zorst ,and then overlay them in logworks ?


That's the plan. Do you know if you export the data to Excel?

Should be able to log pressures and temps all the way through, then it will highlight where the inefficiencies are.

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


fortfun

141 Posts
Member #: 954
Advanced Member

Fort Collins Colorado USA

OK, this is confusing.

How can the engine run this way? At the point where the intake valve opens, you'll have more pressure left inside the cylinder than in the intake manifold, and won't draw in any charge. The only way I can see it would work like this is if the exhaust pressure is quite spikey and you manage to blow down the cylinder far below the average (measured) exhaust pressure.

Not doubting the data, just looking for some info to stop my head spinning. *blush*

1275 with Back Door Turbo


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 19th of Nov, 2007 at 09:01pm fortfun said:
At the point where the intake valve opens, you'll have more pressure left inside the cylinder than in the intake manifold, and won't draw in any charge. The only way I can see it would work like this is if the exhaust pressure is quite spikey and you manage to blow down the cylinder far below the average (measured) exhaust pressure.


This is only at the start of the intake stroke. As soon as the exhaust valve closes and the piston drops, air will be pushed in.

However, it must seriously reduce the volumetric efficiency of the engine.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


robert

User Avatar

6753 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus




On 19th of Nov, 2007 at 09:01pm fortfun said:
OK, this is confusing.

How can the engine run this way? At the point where the intake valve opens, you'll have more pressure left inside the cylinder than in the intake manifold, and won't draw in any charge. The only way I can see it would work like this is if the exhaust pressure is quite spikey and you manage to blow down the cylinder far below the average (measured) exhaust pressure.

Not doubting the data, just looking for some info to stop my head spinning. *blush*



yes this can happen , in fact if you open the inlet valve early enough ,you can get the ex moving from the port to the cylinder and up the inlet ,ughhh

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


stevieturbo

3596 Posts
Member #: 655
Post Whore

Northern Ireland

Which is why a lot of turbo applications do not like overlap.

However, get an efficient setup, boost:EGBP close to 1:1, then we can start to have overlap, and bigger cams which will allow more power.

9.85 @ 145mph
202mph standing mile
speed didn't kill me, but taxation probably will


BENROSS

User Avatar

9812 Posts
Member #: 332
Resident Cylinder Head Modifier

Mitsi Evo 7, 911, Cossie. & all the chavs ...... won no problem

EGBP is the killer as we know
Hence my tailor made exhaust i run on my own mini

its hard to beat a N/A atmo cam above 260 deg what does the job right *wink* for road use

it would be nice to do a back to back test Steve on race valves and the rim flows on the same head ... with just the valves lapped in

Most peepes companies, have not the time and know what produces big power outputs in the 5 port head section

my guess is that there will be a slight benefit, But............ would the average chav basher recognise it ????






fortfun

141 Posts
Member #: 954
Advanced Member

Fort Collins Colorado USA

Right. Of course. Volumetric efficiency shot to heck for sure though as Paul noted.
Thanks - one more thing - at what sort of boost pressure have you guys observed the crossover? I'm presuming that when my wastegate opens at 8psi, I'm never getting close to 8psi back pressure.

1275 with Back Door Turbo


turbo hogster

1641 Posts
Member #: 178
Post Whore

stowmaket suffolk

i gained 5hp on my na 1380 when running rimflows

always looking for them bigger bunches of bannanas

Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > Rimflow valves????
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: