Page:
Home > Technical Chat > Bigger dump pipe and exhaust

pristic

User Avatar

189 Posts
Member #: 1774
Advanced Member

Sydney AUS

Howdy Lads,

I am considering running a bigger dump pipe and exhaust.
Currently its 2" from turbo back.

Issue is with my setup the dump pipe barely squeezes through past the pot-joint.

I am wondering if anyone knows if I use a 2.5" dump pipe but where it cant clear the pot joint I will use a 3" or 3.5" and squish it so its oval (to clear dump, but still have volume) and then back into a 2.5" exhaust.

Will increasing the dump and exhaust benefit me? I was told with turbo's bigger exhaust is usually better (obviously not a crazy 4" system)

Also, the exhaust manifold uses steam pipe and its small 1" ID (I think) or maybe 1-1/4"
Intercooler piping is all 2"

Would bigger pipes for intercooler help?
Bigger intercooler? (Currently using 300za IC with alloy tanks)

Its an 1132cc Turbo - running Hi-flowed Garrett T2 and currently making 106hp atw WITH a blown headgasket (blown in 3 places) fixed now.

Just looking for things to do I guess - 1. To make more bananas and 2. To improve whats there.

Cheers
Pete

1132cc Turbo ~120 bananas ATW - Fun Fun Fun


Bat

User Avatar

4559 Posts
Member #: 786
Post Whore

Bermingum

Hi,
I think you'll need to double your hp before you'll need to worry about that.
Cheers,
Gavin:)

VEMs Authorised Installer / Re-seller. K head kits now available!

WB/EGT gauges. Click here for customers write-up

Visit www.doyouneedabrain.co.uk

My Mini build diary


Paul R

User Avatar

4018 Posts
Member #: 1757
Back to Fucking Tool status

Swindon

On 14th Aug, 2008 Bat said:
Hi,
I think you'll need to double your hp before you'll need to worry about that.
Cheers,
Gavin:)

what he said :)

Drives
-Ford S-max Mk2 Ecoboost
-Rover 100 VVC #2 - track project

Searching is all you need on TurboMinis


pristic

User Avatar

189 Posts
Member #: 1774
Advanced Member

Sydney AUS

so dump and exhaust size wont affect it? 106 was with blown headgasket, its around the 120hp mark atw now (150+ at the crank)

If thats the case, I am happy though, no need for new exhaust :)

Edited by pristic on 15th Aug, 2008.

1132cc Turbo ~120 bananas ATW - Fun Fun Fun


matty

User Avatar

8297 Posts
Member #: 408
Turbo Love Palace Fool

Aylesbury

Im going to try and change mine to 2.5" over the winter and was planning on doing the same as you descirbed, flatten a larger section of tubing so it still keeps the same cross sectional area. Got do some some maths for that though (im a bit rusty)! Lol

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Fusion-Fabri..._homepage_panel

www.fusionfabs.co.uk



1/4mile in 13.2sec @ 111 terminal on 15psi


hario

444 Posts
Member #: 2885
Senior Member

i think cooling the air more effectively before it enters the carb will allow you to add more fuel resulting in more power..
*Bigger intercooler
*more efficient IC, more air (fan) better position etc..
*remove sharp bends in charge pipes.
*Porting compressor (cutting the inles to resemble a bellmouth rather than a seies of jagged steps
*One of those bespoke plenums you can get on here with a stub stack in it if poss.
*IC water/nitrous spray
*Welding up the internal wastegate that dumps waste exhaust back into the path of gasses exiting the exducer and somehow fit yourself an external item with a seperate dump pipe about 2 foot long..
JustMyTwoCents *happy*


Rob H

4314 Posts
Member #: 700
Formerly British Open Classic

The West Country

On 17th Sep, 2008 hario said:

*more efficient IC, more air (fan) better position etc..


A fan won't help, if anything it'll make thinks worse.

Isambard Kingdom Brunel said:
Nothing is impossible if you are an Engineer


James_H

User Avatar

3692 Posts
Member #: 1833
Formally mini_majic

Auckland, New Zealand

you are running quite a high CR are you not? i think i remember reading your thread about your car and it being quite high.

i personally would be dropping the CR abit and adding a better, efficiently mounted IC then upping the boost.

what CR are you running? what boost are you running? Do you know your inlet temps (post IC) ? Megajolt?

i think you will see some nice improvements with the above before your exhaust becomes a worry. and before you need to change your downpipe i would have thought that you would want to go larger diameter primaries on the manifold.


EDIT: i just realised this is from freaking august!!!

Edited by James_H on 17th Sep, 2008.


GaryOS

User Avatar

1424 Posts
Member #: 2810
Formally spanner181187

Dublin, Ireland

I think I remember he was running a 9.4 CR at 16 PSI. It was something mad like that anyway

On 12th Nov, 2009 Paul S said:

I think Gary OS has taken over my role as the forum smart arse *happy*


On 30th Apr, 2010 Rod S said:
Gary's description is best


pristic

User Avatar

189 Posts
Member #: 1774
Advanced Member

Sydney AUS

Hey Lads, Yes, 9.4:1 and that was on 15-16psi

Holds fine *wink* and absolutely hammers. (Head Gaskets are the only issues so far) AF ratios, etc etc are all good.


The only reason I am looking at bigger exhaust is because its choking over 6000rpm
3000 spool, 4000 full boost and run out by 6000... so I have our Garrett distibutor building me a hybrid. GT2554R Turbo but with rear housing off the T2 or a T25 with AR of .48
Spool will be quicker than now, but will carry through to RPMs I will never ever reach... so its perfect.

In talking about the issue with them, they suggested (along with other Mini freaks) that the 2" exhaust is restrictive...

The exhaust manifold on it now flows fine and isnt restricting me...

Yes, I am running Megajolt and have an IC, I DONT have a temp sensor on the inlet side (after IC but really want to get one. Any recommendations, just any temp sensor will work? Just started researching this recently.

Why would I need to drop the compression - I DONT get knock (det, etc) at all, even on 16psi with my compression... I dont plan on running over 15-16psi anyway... and with a more efficient turbo and exhaust I think dropping the boost will still make the same power.

Hario - I agree getting a cooler charge is important and there are bends between my turbo and IC that are a little to sharp, so thats on the cards... moving intercooler over and checking the temps I get.

I come from a school of - if the intercooler is doing its job, dont change it, just a waste of money... so if the temps are close to ambient temps, thats as efficient as an intercooler can get... unless you add mist or meth sprays etc...

I told my turbo guy to feel free to build the hybrid with an external wastegate, I am happy to run one with external gate but is that going to really give me many improvements? I know you can control boost better... is it worth it running external gate if money is not a concern...

Thanks guys,
Pete

Edited by pristic on 18th Sep, 2008.

1132cc Turbo ~120 bananas ATW - Fun Fun Fun


pristic

User Avatar

189 Posts
Member #: 1774
Advanced Member

Sydney AUS

Oh, and as for squeezing the dump pipe in, he said 2.5" pipe is still 2.5" squished... so ill get that stuck in.

Peter

1132cc Turbo ~120 bananas ATW - Fun Fun Fun


AWDmoke

User Avatar

261 Posts
Member #: 713
Senior Member

Western Australia

Actually Pete, it's not.

65mm ID tube has a cross sectional area of 3,318mm square.

Putting a 20mm flat on each side reduces the area to 3,191mm = 4% reduction (but still 63% more than your 50mm)

On 24th Dec, 2008 Nic said:
eyh? im drubj but very confused##]#IU


jbelanger

1267 Posts
Member #: 831
Post Whore

Montreal, Canada

On 18th Sep, 2008 pristic said:
Oh, and as for squeezing the dump pipe in, he said 2.5" pipe is still 2.5" squished... so ill get that stuck in.

Peter

That's not true. A circle is the geometric shape that has the most area for a given perimeter. When you squish the pipe, you don't change the perimeter so you diminish the area which will change the pipe flow.

Jean

http://www.jbperf.com/


pristic

User Avatar

189 Posts
Member #: 1774
Advanced Member

Sydney AUS

What I think he meant was heating it up and making it oval - ie/ Not just squishing it (technical term of course) lol

So you think 2.5" into slightly bigger pipe which is squished and then back to 2.5" is better? Im easy either way... he said the only prob is if the 2.5" pipe WONT fit through, he is saying that the join needs to be at the oval part, via a slip joint - which I dont want at all... I want a 2.5" with V-bands...

Dammit! It HAS to fit somehow...

Peter

1132cc Turbo ~120 bananas ATW - Fun Fun Fun


pristic

User Avatar

189 Posts
Member #: 1774
Advanced Member

Sydney AUS

But what about the other things - ie/ External wastegate and which Temp sender/unit for the inlet temps? I really want to know what the temps are!

1132cc Turbo ~120 bananas ATW - Fun Fun Fun


hario

444 Posts
Member #: 2885
Senior Member

well the main issue with the exhaust side of a turbo is when the housing cannot flow any more gas (when the power curve drops away like you describe) even when the wastegate is fully open, most turbos are still limited because the wastegate dumping right into the gas flow out of the turbo really Really reduces the flow potential of both parts. Using an external wastegate means the turbine has much less of a restriction to push the gas through, Honest, Forced Induction Performance Tuning told me so..
With regards to improved boost control, the answer is exactly the same, rather than the internal wastegate opening a little to modulate boost, it has to open significantly because there is high pressure exhaust directly at the watstegate exit. Does that make sence?! lol google it *happy*


pristic

User Avatar

189 Posts
Member #: 1774
Advanced Member

Sydney AUS

Yep ok, spoke to the tubo guy and he's working on it. Looking for a rear housing to our 'specs' *smiley*

If $$ allows, will go for a quaife diff too, 3.765 open diff at the moment and a little worried lol

Pete

1132cc Turbo ~120 bananas ATW - Fun Fun Fun

Home > Technical Chat > Bigger dump pipe and exhaust
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)  
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: