| Page: |
| Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > subframe modification to lower the car (tower mod) | |||||||
|
4018 Posts Member #: 1757 Back to Fucking Tool status Swindon |
12th Apr, 2009 at 08:02:25pm
i have heard about a few people talking about modifying the tower of the subframe to lower the car by X amount and using spacers with the tower bolts. i have searched for this but have not really known what to type in to find information on it.
Edited by Paul R on 12th Apr, 2009. Drives
|
||||||
![]() 1424 Posts Member #: 2810 Formally spanner181187 Dublin, Ireland |
12th Apr, 2009 at 08:09:08pm
It was recently mentioned in Rob H's build thread and I think it was Jimster that posted pics of it previously. I'll have a search On 12th Nov, 2009 Paul S said:
I think Gary OS has taken over my role as the forum smart arse ![]() On 30th Apr, 2010 Rod S said:
Gary's description is best |
||||||
![]() 1424 Posts Member #: 2810 Formally spanner181187 Dublin, Ireland |
12th Apr, 2009 at 08:13:55pm
Found it:
On 12th Nov, 2009 Paul S said:
I think Gary OS has taken over my role as the forum smart arse ![]() On 30th Apr, 2010 Rod S said:
Gary's description is best |
||||||
|
4314 Posts Member #: 700 Formerly British Open Classic The West Country |
12th Apr, 2009 at 08:49:22pm
It's so easy even I can do it!
Edited by Rob H on 12th Apr, 2009. Isambard Kingdom Brunel said:
Nothing is impossible if you are an Engineer |
||||||
|
4314 Posts Member #: 700 Formerly British Open Classic The West Country |
12th Apr, 2009 at 08:50:46pm
Blooming heck that subframe was heavy, if only I hadn't wrecked my last hole saw notching that blooming cage this morning. Edited by Rob H on 12th Apr, 2009. Isambard Kingdom Brunel said:
Nothing is impossible if you are an Engineer |
||||||
|
4018 Posts Member #: 1757 Back to Fucking Tool status Swindon |
12th Apr, 2009 at 09:34:34pm
does this only really work with a flip front as i have a full steel front welded on ect im geussing it wont lign up very well afterwords. it seems so so simple, what about the vibration from the subframe strait to the shell does this cause any long term problems as i plan to use my car as a road and track car but want it nice and low :)
Drives
|
||||||
|
559 Posts Member #: 2775 Post Whore Aberdeen |
12th Apr, 2009 at 10:00:37pm
Whats the story with the rear subframe mounts? Did you remake these or just move the holes to get everything to line up? I was also thinking about doing this. What does everybody do with the rear brake hose (on the back subframe now) I was just going to move it under the arm to prevent it getting nipped. is that the norm |
||||||
![]() 6966 Posts Member #: 507 Fastest A Series Mini in the World leeds/wakefield. |
13th Apr, 2009 at 08:57:34am
i can't understsnd why in those links above folk have removed the locating lip for the rubber/poly/alu spacer,its not just a spacer it locates the tower to into the crossmsmber without the lip and somekind of locating ring the frame is putting a shear moment into the bolts
|
||||||
![]() 1451 Posts Member #: 328 Post Whore Seaford Rise, South Australia |
13th Apr, 2009 at 09:18:22am
Can some one recommend a suitable hole saw for lightening subframe please? A link would be nice thanks? On 5th Sep, 2011 Vegard said:
I stand corrected. You should know ![]() |
||||||
|
4314 Posts Member #: 700 Formerly British Open Classic The West Country |
13th Apr, 2009 at 09:38:42am
On 13th Apr, 2009 fastcarl said:
i can't understsnd why in those links above folk have removed the locating lip for the rubber/poly/alu spacer,its not just a spacer it locates the tower to into the crossmsmber without the lip and somekind of locating ring the frame is putting a shear moment into the bolts I hear you, and I've been thinking about making some alloy locating rings for that very reason. Isambard Kingdom Brunel said:
Nothing is impossible if you are an Engineer |
||||||
![]() 9502 Posts Member #: 1023 Post Whore Doncaster, South Yorkshire |
13th Apr, 2009 at 09:40:30am
i saw this in another thread a while age but never asked the question that poped into my head so ill ask it now :),
Yes i moved to the darkside |
||||||
![]() 1030 Posts Member #: 1291 Post Whore Suffolk / Birmingham |
13th Apr, 2009 at 09:59:12am
if its rubbing you are going to have some serious handling problems!!
|
||||||
|
493 Posts Member #: 3894 Senior Member sallys gap. garden of Ireland |
13th Apr, 2009 at 10:12:43am
on my road car ivedone this mod around 4 years ago now, and no rubbing/rust problems.
|
||||||
![]() 9502 Posts Member #: 1023 Post Whore Doncaster, South Yorkshire |
13th Apr, 2009 at 02:55:51pm
yeah i suppose it can only rub off paint if it moves and it wont be moving lol
Yes i moved to the darkside |
||||||
|
Site Admin ![]() 9408 Posts Member #: 58 455bhp per ton 12 sec 1/4 mile road legal mini Sunny Bridgend, South Wales |
14th Apr, 2009 at 10:14:08am
On 13th Apr, 2009 fastcarl said:
i can't understsnd why in those links above folk have removed the locating lip for the rubber/poly/alu spacer,its not just a spacer it locates the tower to into the crossmsmber without the lip and somekind of locating ring the frame is putting a shear moment into the bolts Carl, I see your point, but the OD of the ring on the subframe is much smaller than the ID of the ring on the cross member so without a spacer it's useless. And you of all people know that weight is evil. On 15th May, 2009 TurboDave said:
I think the welsh one has it right! 1st to provide running proof of turbo twinkie in a car and first to run a 1/4 in one!! Is your data backed up?? one extra month free for all Turbo minis members, PM me for detials |
||||||
|
9258 Posts Member #: 123 Post Whore Betwix Harrogate and York |
14th Apr, 2009 at 10:53:11am
What you will find running that low, even if you move the subframe is that your spring rate is reduced as the top arm is at such an angle.
Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph
On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:
the design shows a distinct lack of imagination, talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry. |
||||||
|
2497 Posts Member #: 1954 Post Whore Luton Bedfordshire |
14th Apr, 2009 at 01:29:01pm
mine sits on the bump stops its that low acctually ran with the stops out for the most part of last year but put them back for a little added stifness. Own the day
|
||||||
![]() 1030 Posts Member #: 1291 Post Whore Suffolk / Birmingham |
14th Apr, 2009 at 05:22:47pm
mine basicly runs on the stops, hoping to sort it all out this year tho. Coilovers are a good solution no? |
||||||
|
315 Posts Member #: 3013 Senior Member Epsom Surrey |
14th Apr, 2009 at 06:13:23pm
haha mine runs on the stops aswell!!
|
||||||
|
559 Posts Member #: 2775 Post Whore Aberdeen |
14th Apr, 2009 at 07:15:04pm
I am running on the doughnut type competion bumpstops that fix to the top arm. Nice and progressive. |
||||||
![]() 1451 Posts Member #: 328 Post Whore Seaford Rise, South Australia |
14th Apr, 2009 at 07:33:07pm
You boys want to be careful as there is a point at which the balljoint will snap without warning if too low! You can modify the balljoints to stop this mind! On 5th Sep, 2011 Vegard said:
I stand corrected. You should know ![]() |
||||||
|
9258 Posts Member #: 123 Post Whore Betwix Harrogate and York |
14th Apr, 2009 at 07:47:17pm
Good point Scruffy, I checked that mine didn't bind at full compression. Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph
On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:
the design shows a distinct lack of imagination, talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry. |
||||||
![]() 6966 Posts Member #: 507 Fastest A Series Mini in the World leeds/wakefield. |
14th Apr, 2009 at 07:51:37pm
On 14th Apr, 2009 Jimster said:
Jim are you telling me you have no possitive method of location other than the bolts pulling up, carl On 13th Apr, 2009 fastcarl said:
i can't understsnd why in those links above folk have removed the locating lip for the rubber/poly/alu spacer,its not just a spacer it locates the tower to into the crossmsmber without the lip and somekind of locating ring the frame is putting a shear moment into the bolts Carl, I see your point, but the OD of the ring on the subframe is much smaller than the ID of the ring on the cross member so without a spacer it's useless. And you of all people know that weight is evil. JI m , are you telling me you have no possitive |
||||||
|
Forum Mod ![]() 5933 Posts Member #: 784 9 times Avon Park Class C winner Milton Keynes |
14th Apr, 2009 at 08:46:03pm
On 14th Apr, 2009 Scruffy said:
You boys want to be careful as there is a point at which the balljoint will snap without warning if too low! You can modify the balljoints to stop this mind! Just out of interest - by doing what? Paul I seriously doubt it! |
||||||
![]() 1030 Posts Member #: 1291 Post Whore Suffolk / Birmingham |
14th Apr, 2009 at 09:01:21pm
grinding a bit out of the 'cap' i presume |
||||||
| Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > subframe modification to lower the car (tower mod) | |||||||
|
|||||||
| Page: |









I too am looking at changing things around a little this year. Doesnt look like my car is going to see much road action this year. Looks like it is away to embark on a bit of a semi rebuild. Dont you just hate other peoples good ideas?