Your password will probably need resetting - don't panic. We have upgraded a few things and improved the hashing of passwords. Just use the Forgot Password link.
Page:
Home > General Chat > How good are turbo minis as daily drivers on fuel?

minimole23

4309 Posts
Member #: 1321
Post Whore

Wiltshire

I have been considering v-teccing an clubby estate for use as a daily drive to the point where I nearly bought one the other day, but considering the amount of work involved in the conversion and the cost, realistically I could have a 135 bhp turbo engine quite reliably for little outlay.

So say 70% of the speed, fun and practicality could be had for much less effort and cost, as I already have all the parts required for a turbo conversion.

For ordinary driving what sort of mpg figures are people getting with say a spec similar to a 1293, mg metro cam, t3 turbo, 8.8:1 compression and 14psi boost, not forgeting megajolt. I'll run a 3.2:1 final drive.


From research people seem to be getting about 30-35 mpg, which doesn't seem a lot.

James

Edited by minimole23 on 20th Jan, 2011.

On 7th Oct, 2010 5haneJ said:
yeah I gave it all a good prodding


wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York

Well, when running properly I generally achieve over 40mpg on my 998T running 10psi (around 100bhp). But I'm really struggling in this cold weather with a carb problem that I can't solve, so it's running rich.

Averaging around 36mpg.

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph



On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


dan187

User Avatar

774 Posts
Member #: 6724
Post Whore

Wootton Bassett

My car is much the same as Wil's. 998T with 10psi.

I got 40mpg on a 200 mile trip from Cambridge to Warwick. This was a mixture of motorway, dual carriageway and town.

I was quite chuffed too because I wasn't taking it particularly easy on the boost.

1275 N/A Sprite, 998 T2 Turbo Mayfair
1275 EFi Turbo


minimole23

4309 Posts
Member #: 1321
Post Whore

Wiltshire

Thats not sounding to great to be honest, I'd have been expecting more. Their both 998's too.

Time to do some research into vtec mini fuel consumption by the looks of it.

On 7th Oct, 2010 5haneJ said:
yeah I gave it all a good prodding


wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York

I think potentially my car will return 45mpg, it did 50mpg on the way to le mans.

My old 998 T was consistant at 45mpg. ust struggling with this one atm.

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph



On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


mayoturbo

User Avatar

673 Posts
Member #: 1395
Post Whore

chepstow

Could you not get a boost controller so you can run low boost for MPG then higherboost when you want power?


theoneeyedlizard

User Avatar

7265 Posts
Member #: 1268
The Boom Boom speaker Police!

Essex

Inject it?

In the 13's at last!.. Just


minimole23

4309 Posts
Member #: 1321
Post Whore

Wiltshire

My right foot can modulate the boost accurately enough!


On 20th Jan, 2011 theoneeyedlizard said:
Inject it?


Thats hassle and expense.

I need to work out what payback would be really when comparing both options

A vtec would cost more initially say £1500 by the time I've bought the donar vehicle and had various bits like driveshafts made, but then return 45mpg whereas it may only cost me £400 quid to turbo a mini but only return 35mpg.

Out comes the calculator!


On 7th Oct, 2010 5haneJ said:
yeah I gave it all a good prodding


rubicon

User Avatar

3756 Posts
Member #: 1709
I like granny porn.

LONDONSHIRE

Also another key factor is the weight,pulling 750kgs with 100hp is going to use more fuel than pulling 550 for example.

is there anything that can be bought to be put inline the fuel system to show how much fuel was used??

On 2nd Oct, 2009 Vegard said:


On 1st Oct, 2009 Jimster said:
I bet my first wank came quicker than your first mini turbo


These new modern turbos with their quick spool up time, would make the competition harder.


On 15th Aug, 2011 robert said:
phew!!! thank you brett for smashing in my back doors .( not something i imagined writing... EVER)


wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York

It's about 6500 miles to payback the install of the v-tech

or 6500 miles before you have spent what the v-tech cost, depending on which way you look at it

I think.

I also think 35mpg is pessimistic for the turbo lump. If you want economy it can be tuned in.

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph



On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


rubicon

User Avatar

3756 Posts
Member #: 1709
I like granny porn.

LONDONSHIRE

a standard metro turbo would claw back 40 odd mpg,
accroding to the Ad's....

aero has its part to play on them i guess...

On 2nd Oct, 2009 Vegard said:


On 1st Oct, 2009 Jimster said:
I bet my first wank came quicker than your first mini turbo


These new modern turbos with their quick spool up time, would make the competition harder.


On 15th Aug, 2011 robert said:
phew!!! thank you brett for smashing in my back doors .( not something i imagined writing... EVER)


Ben H

User Avatar

3329 Posts
Member #: 184
Senior Member

Melton Mowbray, Pie Country

I don't think that running lower boost would make that much difference to mpg, granted it would make a small difference. Good mpg is all about setting up the cruise, 15+ afr and high advance. That what makes the difference, imo.


On 20th Jan, 2011 mayoturbo said:
Could you not get a boost controller so you can run low boost for MPG then higherboost when you want power?

http://www.twin-turbo.co.uk
http://www.hillclimbandsprint.co.uk/default.asp

A man without a project is like a like a woman without a shopping list.


Brett

User Avatar

9502 Posts
Member #: 1023
Post Whore

Doncaster, South Yorkshire

if you keep it out of boost it shouldnt be much worse than an n/a
my1275 did bout 35-40 ragged every where the 998 must have been over 50 but that was slow so i never bothered ragging it to death except maybe at avon last year

Yes i moved to the darkside *happy*

Instagram @jdm_brett


evolotion

User Avatar

2909 Posts
Member #: 83
Post Whore

Glasgow, Scotland

If cost is your primary motive,ignore b-series hondas and think 1.6 vauxhall/1.6-8 rover, Honda d16. ( sohc) these are the budget installs many people have done for under a grand including buying a donor car. B-series hondas are expensive from every angle, including insurance. Running wise a 16v mini will return figures like what the gents here have quoted when well set up.. So choice is yours really :) well built and set up either will return near 50mpg and be reliable, turbo obviously requiring less initial faffing to get up and going!

turbo 16v k-series 11.9@118.9 :)

Denis O'Brien.


Rick.SPI

User Avatar

1596 Posts
Member #: 8027
Post Whore

Thrapston, Kettering, Northants NN14

also i would take into acount that although you have most of the turbo bits you will most probably find that you need a few moew odds and ends to make it reliable like a cross pin diff for example and the mini engine will need servicing on a more regular basis.

On 17th Feb, 2011 apbellamy said:
I popped my first one out the other day...


minimole23

4309 Posts
Member #: 1321
Post Whore

Wiltshire

I should point out what I'm trying to achieve here really, basically a quick daily mini that will not kill the bank account at the pumps. i.e take a modern powerful engine and bung it in an old light car.


The idea behind the turbo engine was that if the mpg was comparable then I could sacrifice some power and revs for the sake of the work and cost involved in building a vtec mini.


On 20th Jan, 2011 evolotion said:
If cost is your primary motive,ignore b-series hondas and think 1.6 vauxhall/1.6-8 rover, Honda d16. ( sohc) these are the budget installs many people have done for under a grand including buying a donor car. B-series hondas are expensive from every angle, including insurance.


I appreciate what your saying but if I'm going to do an engine conversion it it has to be a vtec. I drive one every day and really can't think of any other engine that gives the power/revs while doing everything else so well. Once you go vtec you don't go back.

On 7th Oct, 2010 5haneJ said:
yeah I gave it all a good prodding


george91

1083 Posts
Member #: 8932
Post Whore

I think that you've already made your decision, you just need to justify the cost of the vtec motor. It will be better on cold mornings and last longer between services, its just the inital cost to get over.


Ben H

User Avatar

3329 Posts
Member #: 184
Senior Member

Melton Mowbray, Pie Country

You know what, I have driven a VTEC and although fun it was annoying after a while. I would argue that if you have driven a decent turbo mini you won't go back. It is the perfect match for the mini.


On 20th Jan, 2011 minimole23 said:
I should point out what I'm trying to achieve here really, basically a quick daily mini that will not kill the bank account at the pumps. i.e take a modern powerful engine and bung it in an old light car.


The idea behind the turbo engine was that if the mpg was comparable then I could sacrifice some power and revs for the sake of the work and cost involved in building a vtec mini.


On 20th Jan, 2011 evolotion said:
If cost is your primary motive,ignore b-series hondas and think 1.6 vauxhall/1.6-8 rover, Honda d16. ( sohc) these are the budget installs many people have done for under a grand including buying a donor car. B-series hondas are expensive from every angle, including insurance.


I appreciate what your saying but if I'm going to do an engine conversion it it has to be a vtec. I drive one every day and really can't think of any other engine that gives the power/revs while doing everything else so well. Once you go vtec you don't go back.

http://www.twin-turbo.co.uk
http://www.hillclimbandsprint.co.uk/default.asp

A man without a project is like a like a woman without a shopping list.


evolotion

User Avatar

2909 Posts
Member #: 83
Post Whore

Glasgow, Scotland




On 20th Jan, 2011 minimole23 said:

On 20th Jan, 2011 evolotion said:
If cost is your primary motive,ignore b-series hondas and think 1.6 vauxhall/1.6-8 rover, Honda d16. ( sohc) these are the budget installs many people have done for under a grand including buying a donor car. B-series hondas are expensive from every angle, including insurance.


I appreciate what your saying but if I'm going to do an engine conversion it it has to be a vtec. I drive one every day and really can't think of any other engine that gives the power/revs while doing everything else so well. Once you go vtec you don't go back.


fair enough, i find them pretty tiring to drive, with the exception of the H22 which has a healthy amount of torque and is actually capable of making progress off vtec, however once you go turbo, you wont go back!

turbo 16v k-series 11.9@118.9 :)

Denis O'Brien.


Johnny

User Avatar

1183 Posts
Member #: 6926
Post Whore

Accrington

i agree with Ben H, the cruise AFR is the right way forward to achieve MPG. i was running 10psi 9.1cr 1360cc and a 2.9FD. at cruise it gets about 14.5 to 15.5afr and when on boost about 11.5 to 12.5 and i managed a good 160miles to about £30 of high octance fuel (1 year ago) this included motorway driving (3,500rpm @ 70mph) and some town driving (heavy foot) i think 35mpg is more than adequate for an 8valve carb turbo!

Think of it this way. my mini did 35mph av and my mates rs did 22mpg av. and i can beat him in a drag race, muwhaha :) so for me this is what im happy with. if it can beat a car which has more power and less mpg its fine *happy*


rubicon

User Avatar

3756 Posts
Member #: 1709
I like granny porn.

LONDONSHIRE

i do alot of miles in the metro, so i jsut fitted a 2.7 FD......90% of my miles are motorway....

On 2nd Oct, 2009 Vegard said:


On 1st Oct, 2009 Jimster said:
I bet my first wank came quicker than your first mini turbo


These new modern turbos with their quick spool up time, would make the competition harder.


On 15th Aug, 2011 robert said:
phew!!! thank you brett for smashing in my back doors .( not something i imagined writing... EVER)


Miniwilliams

User Avatar

5329 Posts
Member #: 140
Proven 200+bhp & Avon Park 05,06,07 Class D 3rd place

Can't tell you about town, but on a run i get high 30, if i'm careful. If you don't think it's much, then what other petrol cars that have 200+ brake get that same economy?

Best 1/4 mile 13.2 seconds @116 mph
First 5 port miniturbo to make over 200 bhp on a carb?
First 5 port miniturbo to make over 200 bhp on Injection?

http://www.mattwoodsphotography.com


Tom Fenton
Site Admin

User Avatar

15300 Posts
Member #: 337
Fearless Tom Fenton, Avon Park 2007 & 2008 class D winner

&

TM legend.

Rotherham South Yorkshire

I have to say I think the economy figures mentioned sound pretty good, if economy is really that important to you go and buy a small diesel, other than that anything above 30 ish MPG from a petrol turbo sounds good in my book.


On 29th Nov, 2016 madmk1 said:


On 28th Nov, 2016 Rob Gavin said:
I refuse to pay for anything else


Like fuel 😂😂


BENROSS

User Avatar

9812 Posts
Member #: 332
Resident Cylinder Head Modifier

Mitsi Evo 7, 911, Cossie. & all the chavs ...... won no problem

i must agree tom, usuall you only get an average driving steady of 26mpg






Johnny

User Avatar

1183 Posts
Member #: 6926
Post Whore

Accrington

yeah like i said, i agree with tom. i was shocked that you were moaning at 40mpg!

my old clio (give to me) did about 42mpg and that was slower than a bus. 35-40mpg is top notch imo

Home > General Chat > How good are turbo minis as daily drivers on fuel?
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: