Page:
Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > Custom inlet manifold, 998

wagon_rider

113 Posts
Member #: 9241
Advanced Member

Edinburgh / Dumfries

Hi lads,

I dont really have any bulkhead/bonnet worries, so I've been considering making a custom inlet manifold.

Has anybody tried this?

I'm sure I read that Vizard suggested long runners post carb, but I dunno if there would be any benefit with a turbo?

Any thoughts? :)

context:


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

A whole day and no replies, dear me :( A few years ago you would have had a couple of pages by now. Sad.

I've spent a lot of time researching this subject and have carried out lots of simulations to determine optimum runner length. I'm using injection, but the is is equally applicable to a carbed engine. The simulations have been verified by dyno runs.

A long runner inlet will make as big an improvement as a highly modified cylinder head. It's a bold statement, but one that can be backed up by reference to many sources around the web.

The science of manifold design was only fully understood in the 1990s although the general principles were accepted well before then. Work by the best scientists developed a detailed understanding of the pulses present in inlet manifolds and also the method to predict the impact of changes to inlet tract design.

Until then, manifolds were really just seen as a packaging problem. Make them short to make everything fit under the bonnet was the general approach. I find it quite ridiculous that people spend £100s on cylinder head work and flow benches and then bolt on the factory manifolds. Air flow through an engine is driven by pressure pulses, not flow capacity. The pressure pulses can be harnessed to greatly improve the engines breathing capacity, even with a standard head.

The Metro turbo manifolds are about the worst option for the turbocharged 5-port from a performance/efficiency perspective.

Look under the bonnet of any modern high performance car and you will find long intake runners. Not throttle bodies bolted directly to the head or simple log style manifolds. Things have moved on, but the Mini world is still stuck in the 80s.

As usual, there is an optimum inlet runner length/diameter. It really depends on the spec of the rest of the engine.

A standard engine/cam/head will make the best torque with a runner length of around 450mm, but will be hampered above 6k rpm. Whereas a well modified engine with a big turbine will make best torque and rev to 8k with 250mm long runners.

Anything shorter then 250mm will hurt torque in the 3k-5k range.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

what Paul says.

for your instalation you may have an easy way out....

the 1.3 maestro manifold.

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Rover-Maestro-1-...=item485e175a0a

however, with the std metro manifold it wont fit as the inlet manifold has to kink up at the head face to miss the metty exhaust manifold.... but if you are putting on a long inlet for pulse tuning... then you may as well put on a long exhaust for the same reasons....

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Nial

78 Posts
Member #: 9073
Advanced Member

Edinburgh

On 12th Dec, 2013 Paul S said:

As usual, there is an optimum inlet runner length/diameter. It really depends on the spec of the rest of the engine.

A standard engine/cam/head will make the best torque with a runner length of around 450mm, but will be hampered above 6k rpm. Whereas a well modified engine with a big turbine will make best torque and rev to 8k with 250mm long runners.


Interesting feedback Paul.

How tuned to a particular rev band is the optimal inlet length (typically)?

When you say runners, is that from the carb face to the head face of the manifold or
does that include the port in the head?

I was always intriqued by Vizards initial reports on the long inlet trumpet with the 90degree
bend at the carb (I can't remember the name). It seemed to offer more torque with little
compromise.


Nial.


apbellamy

User Avatar

16540 Posts
Member #: 4241
King Gaycharger, butt plug dealer, Sheldon Cooper and a BAC but generally a niceish fella if you dont mind a northerner

Rotherham, South Yorkshire

On 12th Dec, 2013 Paul S said:
A whole day and no replies, dear me :( A few years ago you would have had a couple of pages by now. Sad.

It's likely people have read your's and Rod's signatures and thought better of it...

On 11th Feb, 2015 robert said:
i tried putting soap on it , and heating it to brown , then slathered my new lube on it

*hehe!*


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk

On 12th Dec, 2013 apbellamy said:
It's likely people have read your's and Rod's signatures and thought better of it...


How did I get dragged into this thread (assuming you mean me Andy) - I have nothing to add on inlet manifold design as Paul has already posted a lot of information on the subject.

If you don't like member's signatures, you can turn them off in the forum "control panel".

Personally I think mine is much better than most *wink*

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


Carlzilla

User Avatar

3673 Posts
Member #: 9300
Post Whore

Quarry Bonk

A few questions stemming from this...

I have a metro turbo manifold, and now reading this you say theyre pretty cack. With my current planned setup, I'm going to be using a 5 port head, turbo phil ported metro turbo inlet, hif44, a montego turbo plenum, and feed the carbs float with a pitot tube. Now I'm going to be tidying up all around my bulkhead, and I can put a box in if needbe, is there any advantage of adding a rigid pipe from between the metro inlet, and the plenum chamber? even if it is just a short one? maybe around 2" in length, and 45mm in diameter, effectively increasing the inlet length.

Edited by Carlzilla on 12th Dec, 2013.

On 26th Jan, 2012 Tom Fenton said:
ring problems are down to wear or abuse but although annoying it isn't a show stopper

On 5th Aug, 2014 madmk1 said:
Shit the bed! I had snapped the end of my shaft off!!

17.213 @ 71mph, 64bhp n/a (Old Engine)


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 12th Dec, 2013 Nial said:

Interesting feedback Paul.

How tuned to a particular rev band is the optimal inlet length (typically)?

When you say runners, is that from the carb face to the head face of the manifold or
does that include the port in the head?

I was always intriqued by Vizards initial reports on the long inlet trumpet with the 90degree
bend at the carb (I can't remember the name). It seemed to offer more torque with little
compromise.

Nial.


Typically you should expect over 90% peak torque in the range 4k to 7.5k with a 250mm long manifold runner. It's not like a high revving N/A engine which would have a peaky torque curve.

Runner lengths quoted are manifold. Add another 100mm for length from trumpet to valve.

This is what Dave Walker found with dyno testing various lengths:

http://www.emeraldm3d.com/articles/emr-adj-length-intake/


Carl, the individual runners need to be separate.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Carlzilla

User Avatar

3673 Posts
Member #: 9300
Post Whore

Quarry Bonk

Ah okay, thanks for answering Paul.

On 26th Jan, 2012 Tom Fenton said:
ring problems are down to wear or abuse but although annoying it isn't a show stopper

On 5th Aug, 2014 madmk1 said:
Shit the bed! I had snapped the end of my shaft off!!

17.213 @ 71mph, 64bhp n/a (Old Engine)


apbellamy

User Avatar

16540 Posts
Member #: 4241
King Gaycharger, butt plug dealer, Sheldon Cooper and a BAC but generally a niceish fella if you dont mind a northerner

Rotherham, South Yorkshire

I guess it's all down to interpretation. To me, they imply negativity towards other people posting on the forum.

I don't plan to change my forum settings and wouldn't want to force people to change their personal settings based on my opinion (Like Avatars for instance...)

On 11th Feb, 2015 robert said:
i tried putting soap on it , and heating it to brown , then slathered my new lube on it

*hehe!*


Nial

78 Posts
Member #: 9073
Advanced Member

Edinburgh

I think this links to a writeup on the Advanced Products Torque Ram which is what I was talking about...

http://www.theminiforum.co.uk/forums/topic...on-in-mtn-1982/

(Photos are blocked here so I can't check).


Nial


dan187

User Avatar

774 Posts
Member #: 6724
Post Whore

Wootton Bassett

On 13th Dec, 2013 Nial said:
I think this links to a writeup on the Advanced Products Torque Ram which is what I was talking about...

http://www.theminiforum.co.uk/forums/topic...on-in-mtn-1982/

(Photos are blocked here so I can't check).


Nial




As far as I'm aware, the linked product works on a different principle. It uses the velocity of the air and the change of this into pressure to get a small "boost" effect going into the carb.
Tuned length runners work on pressure wave reflections (downstream of the carb) to give a well timed increase in pressure. The issue with the stock manifold is that the timing is off so you get the trough not the peak (think of it as a wave).

1275 N/A Sprite, 998 T2 Turbo Mayfair
1275 EFi Turbo


wagon_rider

113 Posts
Member #: 9241
Advanced Member

Edinburgh / Dumfries

These replies are really really helpful, Thanks very much.

I'm going to get my tape measure and some steel out and I'll report back :)


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 12th Dec, 2013 apbellamy said:
I guess it's all down to interpretation. To me, they imply negativity towards other people posting on the forum.


Pfffft

You only have to look in "Technical Chat" today to understand why people wont post.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk

For the sensitive ones, I've changed my signature...

I thought the previous ones were better, but WTF....

Sorry, OP, not your fault.

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


wagon_rider

113 Posts
Member #: 9241
Advanced Member

Edinburgh / Dumfries




On 13th Dec, 2013 Rod S said:

Sorry, OP, not your fault.


Lol don't worry *wink*


Looking at the yeller book, p138ish, I might try and make something like the tubular Janspeed 1.5" bore


*smiley*

Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > Custom inlet manifold, 998
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)  
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: