| Page: |
| Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > Custom inlet manifold, 998 | |||||||
|
113 Posts Member #: 9241 Advanced Member Edinburgh / Dumfries |
11th Dec, 2013 at 02:17:14pm
Hi lads,
|
||||||
|
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
12th Dec, 2013 at 10:13:36am
A whole day and no replies, dear me :( A few years ago you would have had a couple of pages by now. Sad.
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
![]() 12307 Posts Member #: 565 Carlos Fandango Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex |
12th Dec, 2013 at 10:22:08am
what Paul says.
On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged... Joe, do you have a photo of your tool? http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1 https://joe1977.imgbb.com/ |
||||||
|
78 Posts Member #: 9073 Advanced Member Edinburgh |
12th Dec, 2013 at 12:32:16pm
On 12th Dec, 2013 Paul S said:
As usual, there is an optimum inlet runner length/diameter. It really depends on the spec of the rest of the engine. A standard engine/cam/head will make the best torque with a runner length of around 450mm, but will be hampered above 6k rpm. Whereas a well modified engine with a big turbine will make best torque and rev to 8k with 250mm long runners. Interesting feedback Paul. How tuned to a particular rev band is the optimal inlet length (typically)? When you say runners, is that from the carb face to the head face of the manifold or does that include the port in the head? I was always intriqued by Vizards initial reports on the long inlet trumpet with the 90degree bend at the carb (I can't remember the name). It seemed to offer more torque with little compromise. Nial. |
||||||
![]() 16540 Posts Member #: 4241 King Gaycharger, butt plug dealer, Sheldon Cooper and a BAC but generally a niceish fella if you dont mind a northerner Rotherham, South Yorkshire |
12th Dec, 2013 at 12:39:16pm
On 12th Dec, 2013 Paul S said:
A whole day and no replies, dear me :( A few years ago you would have had a couple of pages by now. Sad. It's likely people have read your's and Rod's signatures and thought better of it... On 11th Feb, 2015 robert said:
i tried putting soap on it , and heating it to brown , then slathered my new lube on it
|
||||||
|
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
12th Dec, 2013 at 01:49:01pm
On 12th Dec, 2013 apbellamy said:
It's likely people have read your's and Rod's signatures and thought better of it... How did I get dragged into this thread (assuming you mean me Andy) - I have nothing to add on inlet manifold design as Paul has already posted a lot of information on the subject. If you don't like member's signatures, you can turn them off in the forum "control panel". Personally I think mine is much better than most
Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
![]() 3673 Posts Member #: 9300 Post Whore Quarry Bonk |
12th Dec, 2013 at 03:32:58pm
A few questions stemming from this...
Edited by Carlzilla on 12th Dec, 2013. On 26th Jan, 2012 Tom Fenton said:
ring problems are down to wear or abuse but although annoying it isn't a show stopper On 5th Aug, 2014 madmk1 said:
Shit the bed! I had snapped the end of my shaft off!! 17.213 @ 71mph, 64bhp n/a (Old Engine) |
||||||
|
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
12th Dec, 2013 at 04:18:02pm
On 12th Dec, 2013 Nial said:
Interesting feedback Paul. How tuned to a particular rev band is the optimal inlet length (typically)? When you say runners, is that from the carb face to the head face of the manifold or does that include the port in the head? I was always intriqued by Vizards initial reports on the long inlet trumpet with the 90degree bend at the carb (I can't remember the name). It seemed to offer more torque with little compromise. Nial. Typically you should expect over 90% peak torque in the range 4k to 7.5k with a 250mm long manifold runner. It's not like a high revving N/A engine which would have a peaky torque curve. Runner lengths quoted are manifold. Add another 100mm for length from trumpet to valve. This is what Dave Walker found with dyno testing various lengths: http://www.emeraldm3d.com/articles/emr-adj-length-intake/ Carl, the individual runners need to be separate. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
![]() 3673 Posts Member #: 9300 Post Whore Quarry Bonk |
12th Dec, 2013 at 05:26:03pm
Ah okay, thanks for answering Paul. On 26th Jan, 2012 Tom Fenton said:
ring problems are down to wear or abuse but although annoying it isn't a show stopper On 5th Aug, 2014 madmk1 said:
Shit the bed! I had snapped the end of my shaft off!! 17.213 @ 71mph, 64bhp n/a (Old Engine) |
||||||
![]() 16540 Posts Member #: 4241 King Gaycharger, butt plug dealer, Sheldon Cooper and a BAC but generally a niceish fella if you dont mind a northerner Rotherham, South Yorkshire |
12th Dec, 2013 at 06:24:09pm
I guess it's all down to interpretation. To me, they imply negativity towards other people posting on the forum.
On 11th Feb, 2015 robert said:
i tried putting soap on it , and heating it to brown , then slathered my new lube on it
|
||||||
|
78 Posts Member #: 9073 Advanced Member Edinburgh |
13th Dec, 2013 at 12:59:46pm
I think this links to a writeup on the Advanced Products Torque Ram which is what I was talking about...
|
||||||
![]() 774 Posts Member #: 6724 Post Whore Wootton Bassett |
13th Dec, 2013 at 02:23:25pm
On 13th Dec, 2013 Nial said:
I think this links to a writeup on the Advanced Products Torque Ram which is what I was talking about... http://www.theminiforum.co.uk/forums/topic...on-in-mtn-1982/ (Photos are blocked here so I can't check). Nial As far as I'm aware, the linked product works on a different principle. It uses the velocity of the air and the change of this into pressure to get a small "boost" effect going into the carb. Tuned length runners work on pressure wave reflections (downstream of the carb) to give a well timed increase in pressure. The issue with the stock manifold is that the timing is off so you get the trough not the peak (think of it as a wave). |
||||||
|
113 Posts Member #: 9241 Advanced Member Edinburgh / Dumfries |
13th Dec, 2013 at 03:21:38pm
These replies are really really helpful, Thanks very much.
|
||||||
|
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
13th Dec, 2013 at 04:12:22pm
On 12th Dec, 2013 apbellamy said:
I guess it's all down to interpretation. To me, they imply negativity towards other people posting on the forum. Pfffft You only have to look in "Technical Chat" today to understand why people wont post. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
|
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
13th Dec, 2013 at 05:08:46pm
For the sensitive ones, I've changed my signature...
Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
|
113 Posts Member #: 9241 Advanced Member Edinburgh / Dumfries |
16th Dec, 2013 at 10:43:59am
On 13th Dec, 2013 Rod S said:
Sorry, OP, not your fault. Lol don't worry
Looking at the yeller book, p138ish, I might try and make something like the tubular Janspeed 1.5" bore
|
||||||
| Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > Custom inlet manifold, 998 | |||||||
|
|||||||
| Page: |





