Page: |
Home > 998cc > 69mm offset bore and 16 valve k head. | |||||||
1391 Posts Member #: 1686 Post Whore Oxford |
7th Dec, 2007 at 07:46:55pm
surely this would work, as it makes almost consistent bore spaceing.
On 19th Feb, 2011 Miniwilliams said:
OMG Robert that's a big one |
||||||
![]() 8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
7th Dec, 2007 at 09:44:11pm
On 7th of Dec, 2007 at 07:46pm Sam said:
surely this would work, as it makes almost consistent bore spaceing. couldent you theoretically put a 16 valve head on it as its almost at the same as the big bore blocks. Thanks Sam. i know its been talked about alot however i havent seen any solution like this talked about. The original conversion by Gregg Temkin was an 850 block offset bored to 68mm using an 1100 crank, but used the K100 8v head. I'm not sure that 69mm would be big enough for the 16v head. Besides, you would have to start with a 850 block and at present we do not know if they will reliably withstand the much of an offset bore. I'm planning a 952cc K100 8v headed turbo using a 998 A+ block, +0.080" pistons and an 850 crank. I've aquired an 850 engine that I will start stripping over the weekend and will investigate if there is enough metal in the 850 block for a 66.6mm or 67.1mm offset bore. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
1391 Posts Member #: 1686 Post Whore Oxford |
7th Dec, 2007 at 10:11:02pm
if you wouldent mind matey it would be intresting to see i think i might just have to venture and spend 4/500 pounds doing this. i dont count the head in the expenses as ill be useing it on another engine. if you could get to 69mm youll be at big bore size anyway so im sure it would just bore wall flexing and such. Edited by Sam on 7th Dec, 2007. On 19th Feb, 2011 Miniwilliams said:
OMG Robert that's a big one |
||||||
![]() 25 Posts Member #: 2002 Member The Netherlands |
10th Dec, 2007 at 03:04:41pm
I still believe that it should be possible to bore a small bore out till big bore bores by utilising the big bore cylinder spacing.
|
||||||
![]() 8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
10th Dec, 2007 at 03:21:48pm
On page 376 of TBASE Vizard talks about using Imp pistons at +0.040" which are 69mm. He is only offsetting the bores by 0.025", but warns of problems with the boring.
Edited by Paul S on 10th Dec, 2007. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
![]() 25 Posts Member #: 2002 Member The Netherlands |
10th Dec, 2007 at 08:39:25pm
hmmm, how much cost linering the block?
|
||||||
4314 Posts Member #: 700 Formerly British Open Classic The West Country |
10th Dec, 2007 at 08:45:51pm
On 10th of Dec, 2007 at 03:21pm Paul S said:
On page 376 of TBASE Vizard talks about using Imp pistons at +0.040" which are 69mm. He is only offsetting the bores by 0.025", but warns of problems with the boring. http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.php?p=vt&tid=165455 Now I feel smug. PS. What version of TBASE do you have? I'm guessing it's not the third version of TBASE. Am I right in thinking that you're trying to find a way of running the pistons down the bores? if so why? is it to prevent the pistons hitting the bores? in which case do you know if there is a real problem? obviously there is greater valve clearance on a 1275 as the longer stroke causes the pistons to travel further down the bore for each degree of rotation, therefore going for a shorter stroke will make matters worse. Now I'm totally confused. Isambard Kingdom Brunel said:
Nothing is impossible if you are an Engineer |
||||||
![]() 8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
10th Dec, 2007 at 08:59:36pm
On 10th of Dec, 2007 at 08:45pm Rob H said:
On 10th of Dec, 2007 at 03:21pm Paul S said:
On page 376 of TBASE Vizard talks about using Imp pistons at +0.040" which are 69mm. He is only offsetting the bores by 0.025", but warns of problems with the boring. http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.php?p=vt&tid=165455 Now I feel smug. PS. What version of TBASE do you have? I'm guessing it's not the third version of TBASE. Am I right in thinking that you're trying to find a way of running the pistons down the bores? if so why? is it to prevent the pistons hitting the bores? in which case do you know if there is a real problem? obviously there is greater valve clearance on a 1275 as the longer stroke causes the pistons to travel further down the bore for each degree of rotation, therefore going for a shorter stroke will make matters worse. Now I'm totally confused. I've only get second edition of TBASE! The problem with running Imp pistons on the 850 crank is that the pistons will sit about 1/2" down the bore. You cannot deck the block enough to make it useable. I'm trying to avoid deep valve cutouts in P20950 pistons that have a top ring groove close to the top of the piston. These are the only decent small bore pistons available. I've plotted the piston movement as the attached. This is the 284 degree duration cam timed at 112 degree LCA. Piston is the yellow line. Looks like I only need a 1.0mm valve cutout if I use this cam. If I reprofile to 255 degree duration, then no cut-outs required. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
![]() 25 Posts Member #: 2002 Member The Netherlands |
10th Dec, 2007 at 11:59:12pm
Did you account in you graph that the valves have an angle compared to the pistons. IE 9,5mm lift maybe only 8mm lift if you measuresed perpendicular to the block surface.
|
||||||
![]() 8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
11th Dec, 2007 at 05:45:46pm
No, but the valve angle is only 20 degrees from the vertical and the cosine of 20 degrees is 0.94, so makes very little difference at the lifts I'm interested in. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
1391 Posts Member #: 1686 Post Whore Oxford |
13th Dec, 2007 at 07:39:03am
not possible then i guess On 19th Feb, 2011 Miniwilliams said:
OMG Robert that's a big one |
||||||
![]() 8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
13th Dec, 2007 at 08:45:24am
No problem.
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
1391 Posts Member #: 1686 Post Whore Oxford |
14th Dec, 2007 at 03:20:45pm
its pissing annoying about the bore spaceing. ill be building a twin cam n/a engine shame i cant do it with the 16v on a small block. i haven't seen it done yet
On 19th Feb, 2011 Miniwilliams said:
OMG Robert that's a big one |
||||||
![]() 25 Posts Member #: 2002 Member The Netherlands |
14th Dec, 2007 at 07:53:34pm
Hmm, would a 970cc a bit of destroying hertitage? Weren't there only a 1000 of these blocks ever made?
|
||||||
1391 Posts Member #: 1686 Post Whore Oxford |
14th Dec, 2007 at 08:59:43pm
well a big block could have a short stroke crank so it isent a problem to get it to 970ish. 8v isent a problem. however 16 valve is a problem because basically you have to pocket 2 sections of each bore and they will open into each other. On 19th Feb, 2011 Miniwilliams said:
OMG Robert that's a big one |
||||||
![]() 171 Posts Member #: 621 Advanced Member nsw austalia |
15th Dec, 2007 at 07:51:31pm
dont know if it would be worth looking at but i had a quick look in the motorbike wreckers the other day and the bore spacing on a 2001 triumph tt600 looks very close too. they also run a similar bore size.
Edited by benjamin on 15th Dec, 2007. 1152cc turboed mini clubman, most powerful 1.1L a-series?
|
||||||
![]() 4559 Posts Member #: 786 Post Whore Bermingum |
15th Dec, 2007 at 08:06:19pm
Hi,
VEMs Authorised Installer / Re-seller. K head kits now available!
|
||||||
![]() 6748 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
15th Dec, 2007 at 08:16:07pm
On 15th of Dec, 2007 at 07:51pm benjamin said:
dont know if it would be worth looking at but i had a quick look in the motorbike wreckers the other day and the bore spacing on a 2001 triumph tt600 looks very close too. they also run a similar bore size. Edit: triumph use a 68mm bore Liquid-cooled, DOHC in-line 4 cylinder Bore & Stroke 68 x 41.3mm Capacity 599cc Compression Ratio 12:1 Maximum Power 110PS (108bhp) @ 12,750 rpm Maximum Torque 68Nm (50.5ft-lb) @ 11,000 rpm ![]() ![]() ![]() i think the 13000 rpm cam profiles may be a drawback ben ? Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
![]() 12307 Posts Member #: 565 Carlos Fandango Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex |
15th Dec, 2007 at 08:38:02pm
Maybe,
On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged... Joe, do you have a photo of your tool? http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1 https://joe1977.imgbb.com/ |
||||||
![]() 8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
15th Dec, 2007 at 08:50:29pm
So who is going to buy that head gasket on ebay ending in less than 20 minutes? Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
![]() 171 Posts Member #: 621 Advanced Member nsw austalia |
15th Dec, 2007 at 09:10:14pm
ok had a little read up on them. there are 3 bikes with the same engine, daytona 600/650 , speed4 and the tt600
1152cc turboed mini clubman, most powerful 1.1L a-series?
|
||||||
![]() 8297 Posts Member #: 408 Turbo Love Palace Fool Aylesbury |
16th Dec, 2007 at 09:25:38am
Ooo this could be an interesting project!!
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Fusion-Fabri..._homepage_panel
|
||||||
Site Admin ![]() 8506 Posts Member #: 16 Sold the turbo and seeing what the C20XE can do! Near Lincoln |
16th Dec, 2007 at 11:34:13am
oooo, new conversion....
|
||||||
![]() 8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
16th Dec, 2007 at 11:47:29am
I would be happier with a bit of Triumph under the bonnet than BMW.
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
![]() 7765 Posts Member #: 74 I pick holes in everything.. Chief ancient post excavator |
16th Dec, 2007 at 11:56:54am
On 15th of Dec, 2007 at 08:06pm Bat said:
Hi, Weren't all the S blocks the same, they just decked them to make the 1071 &970? Cheers, Gavin :) Yes, but there were thin and thick-flange blocks.. So not all A-blocks are the same. You can build a 970 or a 1071 on a normal A/A+ block as well. On 13th Jul, 2012 Ben H said:
Mine gets in the way a bit, but only when it is up. If it is down it does not cause a problem. |
||||||
Home > 998cc > 69mm offset bore and 16 valve k head. | |||||||
|
Page: |