Donations towards server fund so far this month.

 
£0.00 / £100.00 per month
Page:
Home > 998cc > 69mm offset bore and 16 valve k head.

Sam

1391 Posts
Member #: 1686
Post Whore

Oxford

surely this would work, as it makes almost consistent bore spaceing.

couldent you theoretically put a 16 valve head on it as its almost at the same as the big bore blocks.

Thanks

Sam.

i know its been talked about alot however i havent seen any solution like this talked about.

On 19th Feb, 2011 Miniwilliams said:
OMG Robert that's a big one


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 7th of Dec, 2007 at 07:46pm Sam said:
surely this would work, as it makes almost consistent bore spaceing.

couldent you theoretically put a 16 valve head on it as its almost at the same as the big bore blocks.

Thanks

Sam.

i know its been talked about alot however i havent seen any solution like this talked about.


The original conversion by Gregg Temkin was an 850 block offset bored to 68mm using an 1100 crank, but used the K100 8v head.

I'm not sure that 69mm would be big enough for the 16v head.

Besides, you would have to start with a 850 block and at present we do not know if they will reliably withstand the much of an offset bore.

I'm planning a 952cc K100 8v headed turbo using a 998 A+ block, +0.080" pistons and an 850 crank.

I've aquired an 850 engine that I will start stripping over the weekend and will investigate if there is enough metal in the 850 block for a 66.6mm or 67.1mm offset bore.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Sam

1391 Posts
Member #: 1686
Post Whore

Oxford

if you wouldent mind matey it would be intresting to see i think i might just have to venture and spend 4/500 pounds doing this. i dont count the head in the expenses as ill be useing it on another engine. if you could get to 69mm youll be at big bore size anyway so im sure it would just bore wall flexing and such.

Edited by Sam on 7th Dec, 2007.

On 19th Feb, 2011 Miniwilliams said:
OMG Robert that's a big one


ettore bugatti

User Avatar

25 Posts
Member #: 2002
Member

The Netherlands

I still believe that it should be possible to bore a small bore out till big bore bores by utilising the big bore cylinder spacing.
Anyone thought about using liners?

The BMW K1100LT has 70.5mm bore + consistent bore spacing (circa 75mm)
So if you had almost consistent bore spacing you would need a bigger bore then 70.5mm...


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

On page 376 of TBASE Vizard talks about using Imp pistons at +0.040" which are 69mm. He is only offsetting the bores by 0.025", but warns of problems with the boring.

Liners would be essential if you are going to any greater offset.

The cylinder walls are cast to the standard bore spacing. There is not enough metal between cylinders 2 and 3 to get them close enough together.

I'm currently considering boring an 850 to 66.6mm using +0.080" 998 pistons.

The attached shows the bore spacings. Black is the 850 bore, orange is the 66.6mm bore at maximum offset and the yellow is the K100 bore spacing.

I still need to measure the thickness of the cylinder walls to check there is enough metal to do this.




Attachments:

Edited by Paul S on 10th Dec, 2007.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


ettore bugatti

User Avatar

25 Posts
Member #: 2002
Member

The Netherlands

hmmm, how much cost linering the block?
I still love the idea of a short stroke 1300 (silly me)


Rob H

4314 Posts
Member #: 700
Formerly British Open Classic

The West Country

On 10th of Dec, 2007 at 03:21pm Paul S said:
On page 376 of TBASE Vizard talks about using Imp pistons at +0.040" which are 69mm. He is only offsetting the bores by 0.025", but warns of problems with the boring.


http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.php?p=vt&tid=165455

Now I feel smug.

PS. What version of TBASE do you have? I'm guessing it's not the third version of TBASE.

Am I right in thinking that you're trying to find a way of running the pistons down the bores? if so why? is it to prevent the pistons hitting the bores? in which case do you know if there is a real problem? obviously there is greater valve clearance on a 1275 as the longer stroke causes the pistons to travel further down the bore for each degree of rotation, therefore going for a shorter stroke will make matters worse. Now I'm totally confused.

Isambard Kingdom Brunel said:
Nothing is impossible if you are an Engineer


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 10th of Dec, 2007 at 08:45pm Rob H said:
On 10th of Dec, 2007 at 03:21pm Paul S said:
On page 376 of TBASE Vizard talks about using Imp pistons at +0.040" which are 69mm. He is only offsetting the bores by 0.025", but warns of problems with the boring.


http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.php?p=vt&tid=165455

Now I feel smug.

PS. What version of TBASE do you have? I'm guessing it's not the third version of TBASE.

Am I right in thinking that you're trying to find a way of running the pistons down the bores? if so why? is it to prevent the pistons hitting the bores? in which case do you know if there is a real problem? obviously there is greater valve clearance on a 1275 as the longer stroke causes the pistons to travel further down the bore for each degree of rotation, therefore going for a shorter stroke will make matters worse. Now I'm totally confused.


I've only get second edition of TBASE!

The problem with running Imp pistons on the 850 crank is that the pistons will sit about 1/2" down the bore. You cannot deck the block enough to make it useable.

I'm trying to avoid deep valve cutouts in P20950 pistons that have a top ring groove close to the top of the piston. These are the only decent small bore pistons available.

I've plotted the piston movement as the attached. This is the 284 degree duration cam timed at 112 degree LCA. Piston is the yellow line.

Looks like I only need a 1.0mm valve cutout if I use this cam. If I reprofile to 255 degree duration, then no cut-outs required.


Attachments:

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


ettore bugatti

User Avatar

25 Posts
Member #: 2002
Member

The Netherlands

Did you account in you graph that the valves have an angle compared to the pistons. IE 9,5mm lift maybe only 8mm lift if you measuresed perpendicular to the block surface.


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

No, but the valve angle is only 20 degrees from the vertical and the cosine of 20 degrees is 0.94, so makes very little difference at the lifts I'm interested in.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Sam

1391 Posts
Member #: 1686
Post Whore

Oxford

not possible then i guess *frown* i sore an image of a small bore block offset bored and i though it looked fairly even on the bore spacing, i guess the problem being is that with a 16v head having exhaust valves on each side of the cylinder, pocketing the block would just start to open up the bores into each other.

ill have to stick to a 8v head then :(


thanks Paul for your help

Sam

On 19th Feb, 2011 Miniwilliams said:
OMG Robert that's a big one


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

No problem.

I'm deliberating over the same issues at present.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Sam

1391 Posts
Member #: 1686
Post Whore

Oxford

its pissing annoying about the bore spaceing. ill be building a twin cam n/a engine shame i cant do it with the 16v on a small block. i haven't seen it done yet

if i could get hold of a 970 engine although its a big bore it might be fun to use that instead.

On 19th Feb, 2011 Miniwilliams said:
OMG Robert that's a big one


ettore bugatti

User Avatar

25 Posts
Member #: 2002
Member

The Netherlands

Hmm, would a 970cc a bit of destroying hertitage? Weren't there only a 1000 of these blocks ever made?

An other option could be using std overbore with the original bore spacing and (probably) massive block pockets.
I dont know if that would make any sense.


Sam

1391 Posts
Member #: 1686
Post Whore

Oxford

well a big block could have a short stroke crank so it isent a problem to get it to 970ish. 8v isent a problem. however 16 valve is a problem because basically you have to pocket 2 sections of each bore and they will open into each other.

On 19th Feb, 2011 Miniwilliams said:
OMG Robert that's a big one


benjamin

User Avatar

171 Posts
Member #: 621
Advanced Member

nsw austalia

dont know if it would be worth looking at but i had a quick look in the motorbike wreckers the other day and the bore spacing on a 2001 triumph tt600 looks very close too. they also run a similar bore size.


Edit: triumph use a 68mm bore


Liquid-cooled, DOHC in-line 4 cylinder

Bore & Stroke 68 x 41.3mm
Capacity 599cc
Compression Ratio 12:1
Maximum Power 110PS (108bhp) @ 12,750 rpm
Maximum Torque 68Nm (50.5ft-lb) @ 11,000 rpm




Edited by benjamin on 15th Dec, 2007.

1152cc turboed mini clubman, most powerful 1.1L a-series?

http://boostmini.justboard.net/


Bat

User Avatar

4559 Posts
Member #: 786
Post Whore

Bermingum

Hi,
Weren't all the S blocks the same, they just decked them to make the 1071 &970?
Cheers,
Gavin :)

VEMs Authorised Installer / Re-seller. K head kits now available!

WB/EGT gauges. Click here for customers write-up

Visit www.doyouneedabrain.co.uk

My Mini build diary


robert

User Avatar

6748 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus




On 15th of Dec, 2007 at 07:51pm benjamin said:
dont know if it would be worth looking at but i had a quick look in the motorbike wreckers the other day and the bore spacing on a 2001 triumph tt600 looks very close too. they also run a similar bore size.


Edit: triumph use a 68mm bore


Liquid-cooled, DOHC in-line 4 cylinder

Bore & Stroke 68 x 41.3mm
Capacity 599cc
Compression Ratio 12:1
Maximum Power 110PS (108bhp) @ 12,750 rpm
Maximum Torque 68Nm (50.5ft-lb) @ 11,000 rpm






i think the 13000 rpm cam profiles may be a drawback ben ?

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

Maybe,

but thats 13000 on a 600,

on a thousand they'll be a fair bit tamer, possibly still too lairy though.

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

So who is going to buy that head gasket on ebay ending in less than 20 minutes?

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


benjamin

User Avatar

171 Posts
Member #: 621
Advanced Member

nsw austalia

ok had a little read up on them. there are 3 bikes with the same engine, daytona 600/650 , speed4 and the tt600

The TT600 has the hottest cams of all the engines. and the exhaust ports in the tt600 and s4 are oval where as the ports in the d6 and d650 are round.

the s4 has much more midrange so maybe better cam choice?

1152cc turboed mini clubman, most powerful 1.1L a-series?

http://boostmini.justboard.net/


matty

User Avatar

8297 Posts
Member #: 408
Turbo Love Palace Fool

Aylesbury

Ooo this could be an interesting project!!

Surely it would be quite easy to reprofile the cams to suit. Or am I speaking out of my arse?

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Fusion-Fabri..._homepage_panel

www.fusionfabs.co.uk



1/4mile in 13.2sec @ 111 terminal on 15psi


iain
Site Admin

User Avatar

8506 Posts
Member #: 16
Sold the turbo and seeing what the C20XE can do!

Near Lincoln

oooo, new conversion....

i like!!!


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

I would be happier with a bit of Triumph under the bonnet than BMW.

It still would not fit the small bore but may be OK for 1275s.

Someone needs to buy a head gasket to check that the head studs will go in the block.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Vegard

User Avatar

7765 Posts
Member #: 74
I pick holes in everything..

Chief ancient post excavator

Norway




On 15th of Dec, 2007 at 08:06pm Bat said:
Hi,
Weren't all the S blocks the same, they just decked them to make the 1071 &970?
Cheers,
Gavin :)


Yes, but there were thin and thick-flange blocks.. So not all A-blocks are the same.

You can build a 970 or a 1071 on a normal A/A+ block as well.

On 13th Jul, 2012 Ben H said:
Mine gets in the way a bit, but only when it is up. If it is down it does not cause a problem.


Home > 998cc > 69mm offset bore and 16 valve k head.
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: